Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28693489›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2017

Inducible clindamycin and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.

R P Adhikari, S Shrestha, A Barakoti, R Amatya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nasal Carriage of Methicillin-ResistantInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. EudragitBiomedicines · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prevalence and Clindamycin Resistance Profile ofInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  18. Mupirocin-ResistantBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  19. Inducible Clindamycin-ResistantInternational journal of microbiology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R P AdhikariDepartment of Microbiology, Nepal Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Jorpati, Kathmandu, Nepal. rampd11@yahoo.com.
S ShresthaDepartment of Microbiology, Nepal Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Jorpati, Kathmandu, Nepal.
A BarakotiDepartment of Microbiology, Nepal Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Jorpati, Kathmandu, Nepal.
R AmatyaDepartment of Microbiology, Nepal Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Jorpati, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaphylococcus aureus, an important nosocomial pathogen, is frequently associated with infections in human. The management of the infections by it especially methicillin resistant ones is often difficult because methicillin resistant S. aureus is usually resistant to multiple antibiotics. Macrolide-lincosamide streptogramin B family of antibiotics is commonly used to treat such infections as an alternative to vancomycin.

methodsThis study was conducted over the period of one and half year from November 2013-April 2015 in Microbiology laboratory of Nepal Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal to find the incidence of different phenotypes of MLS

resultsOf the 270 clinical isolates of S. aureus, 25.1% (68/270) were MRSA. Erythromycin and clindamycin resistance was seen in 54.4% (147/270) and 41.8% (113/270) isolates respectively. Resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin were higher in MRSA as compared to MSSA (erythromycin-resistance: 88.2% Vs 39.1% and clindamycin-resistance: 79.4% Vs 41.8%). The overall prevalence of

conclusionsDetection rate of MRSA in our study shows the necessity to improve in healthcare practices and to formulate new policy for the control of MRSA infections. Clindamycin resistance in the form of

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolClindamycinCross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialErythromycinFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinErythromycinMacrolidesMethicillinInducible clindamycin resistanceMRSANepalStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID28693489
PMCPMC5504788
OpenAlexW2735705643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.