Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28693468›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2017

The self-regulated learning of medical students in the clinical environment - a scoping review.

Kenneth K Cho, Brahm Marjadi, Vicki Langendyk, Wendy Hu

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Looking back to look forward: Learning from past innovations in family medicine training.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Measurement Invariance of Self-Regulated Learning Perception Scale in Medical Students.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kenneth K ChoSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia. cho_kenneth@hotmail.com.
Brahm MarjadiSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia.
Vicki LangendykSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia.
Wendy HuSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-regulated learning is the individual's ability to effectively use various strategies to reach their learning goals. We conducted this scoping review to explore what has been found regarding self-regulated learning in the clinical environment and how this was measured.

methodsUsing Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework, we searched three medical and educational databases as well as Google Scholar for literature on the self-regulated learning of medical students in the clinical environment published between 1966 and February 2017. After results were screened and relevant studies were identified, the data was summarised and discursively reported.

resultsThe search resulted in 911 articles, with 14 articles included in the scoping review after the inclusion criteria was applied. Self-regulated learning was explored in these studies in various ways including qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. Three major findings were found: 1) levels of self-regulated learning change in the clinical environment, 2) self-regulated learning is associated with academic achievement, success in clinical skills and mental health and 3) various factors can support self-regulated learning levels in medical students.

conclusionsMost of articles exploring the self-regulated learning of medical students during the clinical years have been published in the last 5 years, suggesting a growing interest in the area. Future research could explore the self-regulated learning levels of medical students during the clinical years using a longitudinal approach or through the use of novel qualitative approaches.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipClinical CompetenceHealth Services ResearchLearningGrounded TheoryHumansSelf-ControlStudents, MedicalClerkshipClinical yearsScoping reviewSelf-regulated learning

Identifiers

PMID28693468
PMCPMC5504849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.