Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28693449›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2017

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in mucosal primary head and neck cancer: a prospective imaging biomarker study.

Christopher N Rumley, Mark T Lee, Lois Holloway, Robba Rai, Myo Min, Dion Forstner, Allan Fowler, Gary Liney

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher N RumleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia. Christopher.Rumley@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.
Mark T LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Lois HollowayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Robba RaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Myo MinSunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, QLD, Australia.
Dion ForstnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Allan FowlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Gary LineyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
Liverpool Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUSunshine Coast University Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadical radiotherapy, with or without concomitant chemotherapy forms the mainstay of organ preservation approaches in mucosal primary head and neck cancer. Despite technical advances in cancer imaging and radiotherapy administration, a significant proportion of patients fail to achieve a complete response to treatment. For those patients who do achieve a complete response, acute and late toxicities remain a cause of morbidity. A critical need therefore exists for imaging biomarkers which are capable of informing patient selection for both treatment intensification and de-escalation strategies. METHODS/

designA prospective imaging study has been initiated, aiming to recruit patients undergoing radical radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for mucosal primary head and neck cancer (MPHNC). Eligible patients are imaged using FDG-PET/CT before treatment, at the end of week 3 of treatment and 12 weeks after treatment completion according to local imaging policy. Functional MRI using diffusion weighted (DWI), blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) sequences is carried out prior to, during and following treatment. Information regarding treatment outcomes will be collected, as well as physician-scored and patient-reported toxicity. DISCUSSION: The primary objective is to determine the correlation of functional MRI sequences with tumour response as determined by FDG-PET/CT and clinical findings at 12 weeks post-treatment and with local control at 12 months post-treatment. Secondary objectives include prospective correlation of functional MRI and PET imaging with disease-free survival and overall survival, defining the optimal time points for functional MRI assessment of treatment response, and determining the sensitivity and specificity of functional MRI sequences for assessment of potential residual disease following treatment. If the study is able to successfully characterise tumours based on their functional MRI scan characteristics, this would pave the way for further studies refining treatment approaches based on prognostic and predictive imaging data.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12616000534482 (26 April 2016).

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiomarkersCombined Modality TherapyFluorodeoxyglucose F18Head and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMucous MembranePositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersFluorodeoxyglucose F18ChemoradiationDiffusion-weighted imagingDynamic contrast-enhanced MRIFunctional imagingHead and neck cancerHypoxiaMRIPredictive role

Identifiers

PMID28693449
PMCPMC5502487
OpenAlexW2725707848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.