ArticleOncology letters2017
Bevacizumab as a last-line treatment for glioblastoma following failure of radiotherapy, temozolomide and lomustine.
Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of targeted therapies and immunotherapies in the management of progressive glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Quantification of Bevacizumab Activity Following Treatment of Patients With Ovarian Cancer or Glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Trial
- In Vitro Evaluation of PARP1 Inhibitor Olaparib-Cyanine Dye Conjugate for the Treatment of Glioblastoma.ChemMedChem · 2026Article
- Treatment mechanism and research progress of bevacizumab for glioblastoma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
- Targeting the tumour vasculature: from vessel destruction to promotion.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024Review
- A patient-derived xenograft mouse platform from epithelioid glioblastoma provides possible druggable screening and translational study.American journal of cancer research · 2024Article
- Recognition and Management of the Long-term Effects of Cranial Radiation.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- Re-irradiation combined with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma beyond bevacizumab failure: survival outcomes and prognostic factors.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Bevacizumab is associated with cerebral microstructural alterations: a DTI study in high-grade glioma.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Induction of Ferroptosis in Glioblastoma and Ovarian Cancers by a New Pyrrole Tubulin Assembly Inhibitor.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2022Article
- Polymer nanocarriers for targeted local delivery of agents in treating brain tumors.Nanotechnology · 2022Review
- Development of WRAP5 Peptide Complexes for Targeted Drug/Gene Co-Delivery toward Glioblastoma Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Advances in Preclinical/Clinical Glioblastoma Treatment: Can Nanoparticles Be of Help?Cancers · 2022Review
- Glioma-Associated Microglia Characterization in the Glioblastoma Microenvironment through a 'Seed-and Soil' Approach: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Advanced MRI Protocols to Discriminate Glioma From Treatment Effects: State of the Art and Future Directions.Frontiers in radiology · 2022Review
- The relationship between the degree of brain edema regression and changes in cognitive function in patients with recurrent glioma treated with bevacizumab and temozolomide.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Clinical Outcome of Cytoreductive Surgery Prior to Bevacizumab for Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2021Article
- Article
- PSMB8 inhibition decreases tumor angiogenesis in glioblastoma through vascular endothelial growth factor A reduction.Cancer science · 2020Article
- A map of tumor-host interactions in glioma at single-cell resolution.GigaScience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In previous trials, bevacizumab failed to prolong the overall survival time in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and at the first recurrence. Randomized clinical trials at the second or further recurrence following the failure of radiotherapy, temozolomide and lomustine, and retrospective analyses focusing on this specific cohort, are not yet available. A total of 62 patients with glioblastoma who received bevacizumab after the failure of standard care, including radiotherapy, temozolomide and lomustine, were retrospectively identified. Patient characteristics, previous treatment details, concomitant therapy, response based on the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times and rates were evaluated. Furthermore, the PFS and OS times and rates were analyzed for responders and non-responders. Of the patients, 54.8% (n=34) responded to treatment [complete response (CR) 3.2%, n=2; partial response (PR) 51.6%, n=32]. The median PFS time was 3.5 months and the median OS time was 7.5 months. The PFS rate at 6 months was 21.5% and the OS rate at 12 months was 11.5%. Responders (CR or PR) experienced a superior median PFS time compared with non-responders (i.e. stable or progressive disease; 5.4 vs. 1.9 months; P<0.0001) and a superior PFS rate at 6 months (34.9 vs. 7.1%; P<0.0001). The median OS time (8.6 vs. 6.4 months; P<0.0001) and OS rate at 12 months (21.3 vs. 0%; P<0.0001) were also superior in patients who exhibited a response to bevacizumab treatment. In conclusion, the objective response rate and the PFS and OS times and rates indicate that bevacizumab has activity in patients with glioblastoma following the failure of radiotherapy, temozolomide, and lomustine. A randomized trial comparing bevacizumab with best supportive care in these patients is advised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.