ArticleOncology letters2017
Validation and ranking of seven staging systems of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based development and validation of a scoring system for progression-free survival in liver cancer.Hepatology international · 2020Trial
- Pathomics signatures and cuproptosis-related genes signatures for prediction of prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Arterial chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in China: consensus recommendations.Hepatology international · 2024Article
- An immune-related biomarker index for predicting the effectiveness of immunotherapy and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- [Construction of a prognostic model for hepatocellular carcinoma based on pyroptosis-related genes].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023Article
- Evaluation and Application of Drug Resistance by Biomarkers in the Clinical Treatment of Liver Cancer.Cells · 2023Review
- Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization(MC-hccAI 001): Development and Validation of the ALFP Score.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2023Article
- Novel Nomograms Based on Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predict Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients After Hepatectomy.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2023Article
- Scoring systems for the management of oncological hepato-pancreato-biliary patients.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2022Review
- Prognostic Value of Macrophage-Associated Long Non-Coding RNA Expression for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2022Article
- G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 4 Is a Novel Prognostic Factor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram prediction model for early mortality in patients with primary malignant cardiac tumors.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Review
- Prognostic evaluation of HCC patients undergoing surgical resection: an analysis of 8 different staging systems.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- A nomogram predicting the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients after laparoscopic hepatectomy.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2019Article
- Staging systems of hepatocellular carcinoma: A review.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Dynamically prognosticating patients with hepatocellular carcinoma through survival paths mapping based on time-series data.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Activation of the TLR4/MyD88 signaling pathway contributes to the development of human hepatocellular carcinoma via upregulation of IL-23 and IL-17A.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Characteristics of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Aggressiveness Factors in Turkish Patients.Oncology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of seven staging systems to predict 3- and 6-month and cumulative survival rates of patients with advanced hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Data were collected from 220 patients with HBV-associated HCC who did not receive any standard anticancer treatment. Participants were patients at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from September 2008 to June 2010. The participants were classified according to the Chinese University Prognostic Index (CUPI), the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP), Japan Integrated Staging (JIS), China Integrated Score (CIS) systems, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), Okuda and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging systems at the time of diagnosis and during patient follow-up. The sensitivity and specificity of the predictive value of each staging system for 3- and 6-month mortality were analyzed by relative operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with a non-parametric test being used to compare the area under curve (AUC) of the ROC curves. In addition, log-rank tests and Kaplan-Meier estimator survival curves were applied to compare the overall survival rates of the patients with HCC defined as advanced using the various staging systems, and the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) were used to evaluate the predictive value for overall survival in patients with advanced HCC. Using univariate and multivariate Cox's model analyses, the factors predictive of survival were also identified. A total of 220 patients with HBV-associated HCC were analyzed. Independent prognostic factors identified by multivariate analyses included tumor size, α-fetoprotein levels, blood urea nitrogen levels, the presence or absence of portal vein thrombus, Child-Pugh score and neutrophil count. When predicting 3-month survival, the AUCs of CLIP, CIS, CUPI, Okuda, TNM, JIS and BCLC were 0.806, 0.772, 0.751, 0.731, 0.643, 0.754 and 0.622, respectively. When predicting 6-month survival, the AUCs of CLIP, CIS, CUPI, Okuda, TNM, JIS and BCLC were 0.828, 0.729, 0.717, 0.692, 0.664, 0.746 and 0.575, respectively. For 3-month mortality, the prognostic value of CLIP ranked highest, followed by CIS; for 6-month mortality, the prognostic value of CLIP also ranked highest, followed by JIS. No significant difference between the AUCs of CLIP and CIS (P>0.05) in their predictive value for 3-month mortality was observed. The AUC of CLIP was significantly higher compared with that of the other staging systems (P<0.05) for predicting 6-month mortality. The χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.