Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28693035›Full record

ArticleNature2017

K

Marco Lolicato, Cristina Arrigoni, Takahiro Mori, Yoko Sekioka, Clifford Bryant, Kimberly A Clark, Daniel L Minor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Gating crosstalk in potassium channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Structure-Function Relationships of KAdvances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. TREK-1 and epilepsy: regulating the balance of KBehavioral and brain functions : BBF · 2025
    Review

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco LolicatoCardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California 941158-9001, USA.
Cristina ArrigoniCardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California 941158-9001, USA.
Takahiro MoriOno Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Mishima-Gun, Osaka 618-8585, Japan.
Yoko SekiokaOno Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Mishima-Gun, Osaka 618-8585, Japan.
Clifford BryantSmall Molecule Discovery Center, University of California, San Francisco, California 93858-2330, USA.
Kimberly A ClarkCardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California 941158-9001, USA.
Daniel L MinorCardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California 941158-9001, USA.

Funding

Genetic and chemical biological studies of K2P structure, function, andmodulationR01MH093603 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DANIEL L MINOR · 2011 to 2026
$8.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymodal thermo- and mechanosensitive two-pore domain potassium (K

Indexed as

AnimalsArachidonic AcidBenzamidesBinding SitesHEK293 CellsHumansIon Channel GatingLipidsMiceModels, MolecularPichiaPotassium Channels, Tandem Pore DomainProtein ConformationSulfonamidesThiophenesXenopus laevisArachidonic AcidBenzamidesKCNK10 protein, humanLipidsN-(2-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)ethyl)thiophene-2-carboxamideN-((2,4-dichlorophenyl)methyl)-4-(methanesulfonamido)benzamidepotassium channel protein TREK-1Potassium Channels, Tandem Pore DomainSulfonamidesThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID28693035
PMCPMC5778891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.