Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28692851›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and biology2017

A simple device to convert a small-animal PET scanner into a multi-sample tissue and injection syringe counter.

Michael V Green, Jurgen Seidel, Peter L Choyke, Elaine M Jagoda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael V GreenMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States; Contractor to Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, MD, United States. Electronic address: greenmich@nih.gov.
Jurgen SeidelMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States; Contractor to Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, MD, United States.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Elaine M JagodaMolecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

Intracellular In vivo ImagingZIABC010657 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$20.3M
Instrumentation for microSPECT and microPET imagingZIABC010668 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$11.0M
CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CIntramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010668NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe describe a simple fixture that can be added to the imaging bed of a small-animal PET scanner that allows for automated counting of multiple organ or tissue samples from mouse-sized animals and counting of injection syringes prior to administration of the radiotracer. The combination of imaging and counting capabilities in the same machine offers advantages in certain experimental settings.

methodsA polyethylene block of plastic, sculpted to mate with the animal imaging bed of a small-animal PET scanner, is machined to receive twelve 5-ml containers, each capable of holding an entire organ from a mouse-sized animal. In addition, a triangular cross-section slot is machined down the centerline of the block to secure injection syringes from 1-ml to 3-ml in size. The sample holder is scanned in PET whole-body mode to image all samples or in one bed position to image a filled injection syringe. Total radioactivity in each sample or syringe is determined from the reconstructed images of these objects using volume re-projection of the coronal images and a single region-of-interest for each. We tested the accuracy of this method by comparing PET estimates of sample and syringe activity with well counter and dose calibrator estimates of these same activities.

resultsPET and well counting of the same samples gave near identical results (in MBq, R

conclusionA small-animal PET scanner can be easily converted into a multi-sample and syringe counting device by the addition of a sample block constructed for that purpose. This capability, combined with live animal imaging, can improve efficiency and flexibility in certain experimental settings.

Indexed as

SyringesAnimalsInjectionsMicePositron-Emission TomographyRadioactive TracersRadioactive TracersCancer drug developmentMouse bio-distribution studiesPET imaging of excised mouse tissuesPET pre-clinical imaging

Identifiers

PMID28692851
PMCPMC5610080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.