Baby-Led Weaning-Safe and Effective but Not Preventive of Obesity.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Feeding Difficulty Among Chinese Toddlers Aged 1-3 Years and Its Association With Health and Development.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021
   Article
2. Positive parenting approaches and their association with child eating and weight: A narrative review from infancy to adolescence.Pediatric obesity · 2020
   Article
3. [Heritability of obesity in children aged 30-36 months and an analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms at four loci in Xi'an, China].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Effect of a Baby-Led Approach to Complementary Feeding on Infant Growth and Overweight: A Randomized Clinical Trial.2017

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as