Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28692704›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Oral cancer via the bargain bin: The risk of oral cancer associated with a smokeless tobacco product (Naswar).

Zohaib Khan, Steffen Dreger, Syed Majid Hussain Shah, Hermann Pohlabeln, Sheraz Khan, Zakir Ullah, Basheer Rehman, Hajo Zeeb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Behavior Change Intervention for Smokeless Tobacco Cessation Delivered Through Dentists in Dental Settings: A Pragmatic Pilot Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Smokeless tobacco: knowledge, attitudes and usage in Pakistan.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Zohaib KhanLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1885-8254
Steffen DregerLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Syed Majid Hussain ShahAyub Medical College-Dental Section, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Hermann PohlabelnLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Sheraz KhanKhyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Zakir UllahKhyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Basheer RehmanKhyber College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Hajo ZeebLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS · DEUniversity of Bremen · DEAyub Medical College · PKKhyber Medical College · PKKhyber Medical University · PKKhyber Teaching Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the wake of smokeless tobacco (SLT) being advocated as a mean of tobacco harm reduction, it is pertinent to establish individual health risks associated with each SLT product. This case-control study was aimed at assessing the risk of oral cancer associated with a smokeless tobacco product (Naswar). The study was conducted from September 2014 till May 2015 in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Exposure and covariate information was collected through a structured questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). 84 oral cancer cases (62% males) and 174 age- and sex-matched controls were recruited. Ever users of Naswar had more than a 20-fold higher risk of oral cancer compared to never-users (OR 21.2, 95% CI 8.4-53.8). Females had a higher risk of oral cancer with the use of Naswar (OR 29.0, 95% CI 5.4-153.9) as compared to males (OR 21.0, 95% CI 6.1-72.1). Based on this result, 68% (men) and 38% (women) of the oral cancer burden in Pakistan is attributable to Naswar. The risk estimates observed in this study are comparable to risk estimates reported by previous studies on other forms of SLT use and the risk of oral cancer in Pakistan. The exposure-response relationship also supports a strong role of Naswar in the etiology of oral cancer in Pakistan. Although still requiring further validation through independent studies, these findings may be used for smokeless tobacco control in countries where Naswar use is common.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLife StyleLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsPakistanRisk FactorsTobacco, Smokeless

Identifiers

PMID28692704
PMCPMC5503251
OpenAlexW2735021405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.