Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28692083›Full record

ReviewBiomaterials science2017

Using biomaterials to rewire the process of wound repair.

Anna Stejskalová, Benjamin D Almquist

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomaterials science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The applications and mechanisms ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane Grafting After Laser Excision for Oral Mucosal Lesions.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna StejskalováDepartment of Bioengineering, Royal School of Mines, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. b.almquist@imperial.ac.uk.
Benjamin D AlmquistDepartment of Bioengineering, Royal School of Mines, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. b.almquist@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9718-777X

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is one of the most complex processes that our bodies must perform. While our ability to repair wounds is often taken for granted, conditions such as diabetes, obesity, or simply old age can significantly impair this process. With the incidence of all three predicted to continue growing into the foreseeable future, there is an increasing push to develop strategies that facilitate healing. Biomaterials are an attractive approach for modulating all aspects of repair, and have the potential to steer the healing process towards regeneration. In this review, we will cover recent advances in developing biomaterials that actively modulate the process of wound healing, and will provide insight into how biomaterials can be used to simultaneously rewire multiple phases of the repair process.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsEpitheliumHumansInflammationNeovascularization, PhysiologicWound HealingBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID28692083
PMCPMC5576529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.