Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28692062›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2017

Neural reactivations during sleep determine network credit assignment.

Tanuj Gulati, Ling Guo, Dhakshin S Ramanathan, Anitha Bodepudi, Karunesh Ganguly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neural Circuit Mapping and Neurotherapy-Based Strategies.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Coupling of Slow Oscillations in the Prefrontal and Motor Cortex Predicts Onset of Spindle Trains and Persistent Memory Reactivations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tanuj GulatiNeurology and Rehabilitation Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3243-7883
Ling GuoNeurology and Rehabilitation Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Dhakshin S RamanathanNeurology and Rehabilitation Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Anitha BodepudiNeurology and Rehabilitation Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Karunesh GangulyNeurology and Rehabilitation Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2570-9943

Funding

Development of circuit-based therapies for motor recovery after strokeK02NS093014 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GANGULY, KARUNESH · 2015 to 2019
$921k
Closed-loop Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery Post StrokeR00NS097620 · NINDS · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI GULATI, TANUJ · 2019 to 2021
$747k
Closed-loop Brain Stimulation for Motor Recovery Post StrokeK99NS097620 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GULATI, TANUJ · 2017 to 2018
$176k
Neurophysiological Basis for Enhancing Motor Recovery After StrokeI01RX001640 · VA · VETERANS AFFAIRS MED CTR SAN FRANCISCO · PI Karunesh Ganguly · 2016 to 2026
–
Enhancing Neural Circuit Plasticity to Promote Recovery After TBIIK2BX003308 · VA · VETERANS AFFAIRS MED CTR SAN FRANCISCO · PI RAMANATHAN, DHAKSHIN · 2016 to 2020
–
BLRD VA IK2 BX003308NINDS NIH HHS K02 NS093014NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS097620RRD VA I01 RX001640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental goal of motor learning is to establish the neural patterns that produce a desired behavioral outcome. It remains unclear how and when the nervous system solves this 'credit assignment' problem. Using neuroprosthetic learning, in which we could control the causal relationship between neurons and behavior, we found that sleep-dependent processing was required for credit assignment and the establishment of task-related functional connectivity reflecting the casual neuron-behavior relationship. Notably, we observed a strong link between the microstructure of sleep reactivations and credit assignment, with downscaling of non-causal activity. Decoupling of spiking to slow oscillations using optogenetic methods eliminated rescaling. Thus, our results suggest that coordinated firing during sleep is essential for establishing sparse activation patterns that reflect the causal neuron-behavior relationship.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsMaleMotor CortexNerve NetNeuronsOptogeneticsRatsRats, Long-EvansSleep

Identifiers

PMID28692062
PMCPMC5808917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.