Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28691862›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical screening2018

Simplifying Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification of mammograms with pure suspicious calcifications.

Gisela Lg Menezes, Gonneke Ao Winter-Warnars, Eva L Koekenbier, Emma J Groen, Helena M Verkooijen, Ruud M Pijnappel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical screening, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gisela Lg Menezes1 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gonneke Ao Winter-Warnars2 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva L Koekenbier1 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Emma J Groen3 Department of Pathology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Helena M Verkooijen1 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ruud M Pijnappel1 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the risk of malignancy following stereotactic breast biopsy of calcifications classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3, 4, and 5. Methods The study included women with pure calcifications (not associated with masses or architectural distortions) who underwent stereotactic breast biopsy at the Dutch Cancer Institute between January 2011 and October 2013. Suspicious calcifications (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3, 4, or 5) detected on mammography were biopsied. All lesions were assessed by breast radiologists and classified according to the BI-RADS lexicon. Results Overall, 473 patients underwent 497 stereotactic breast biopsies. Sixty-six percent (326/497) of calcifications were classified B4, 30% (148/497) B3, and 4% (23/497) B5. Of the 226 (45%) malignant lesions, there were 182 pure ductal carcinoma in situ, 22 mixed ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinomas (ductal or lobular), 21 pure invasive carcinomas, and one angiosarcoma. Malignancy was found in 32% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24 to 0.39) of B3, 49% (95% CI 0.43 to 0.54) of B4, and 83% (95% CI 0.61 to 0.95) of B5 calcifications. Conclusions Considering the high predictive value for malignancy in B3 calcifications, we propose that these lesions should be classified as suspicious (B4), especially in a screening setting.

Indexed as

Data SystemsAdultAgedBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsCalcinosisCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedNetherlandsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesStereotaxic TechniquesBI-RADSbreast cancercalcificationsmammographyscreening

Identifiers

PMID28691862
PMCPMC5956567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.