Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28691732›Full record

ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2018

Prereader to beginning reader: changes induced by reading acquisition in print and speech brain networks.

Katarzyna Chyl, Bartosz Kossowski, Agnieszka Dębska, Magdalena Łuniewska, Anna Banaszkiewicz, Agata Żelechowska, Stephen J Frost, William Einar Mencl, Marek Wypych, Artur Marchewka and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Katarzyna ChylLaboratory of Psychophysiology, Department of Neurophysiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS, Warsaw, Poland.
Bartosz KossowskiLaboratory of Brain Imaging, Neurobiology Center, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka DębskaLaboratory of Psychophysiology, Department of Neurophysiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena ŁuniewskaLaboratory of Psychophysiology, Department of Neurophysiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna BanaszkiewiczLaboratory of Brain Imaging, Neurobiology Center, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS, Warsaw, Poland.
Agata ŻelechowskaLaboratory of Psychophysiology, Department of Neurophysiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS, Warsaw, Poland.
Stephen J FrostHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA.
William Einar MenclHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA.
Marek WypychLaboratory of Brain Imaging, Neurobiology Center, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS, Warsaw, Poland.
Artur MarchewkaLaboratory of Brain Imaging, Neurobiology Center, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS, Warsaw, Poland.
Kenneth R PughHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA.
Katarzyna JednorógLaboratory of Psychophysiology, Department of Neurophysiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, PAS, Warsaw, Poland.
Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego · PLHaskins Laboratories · USInstitute of Geophysics · PLInstitute of Neurobiology · BGUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Warsaw · PLWarsaw University of Technology · PL

Funding

Visual word identification: phonology &morphologyP01HD001994 · NICHD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI MENCL, EINAR · 1985 to 2016
$23.5M
Tracking neurocognitive changes during evidence-based reading instruction in typically and atypically developing childrenR37HD090153 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI Kenneth R. Pugh · 2017 to 2026
$6.0M
Predictors of Non- Response in Young Dyslexic Children with Co-Morbid ADHDP01HD070837 · NICHD · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZEVIN, JASON D · 2013 to 2018
$4.6M
Experiential and child factors that determine acquisition of orthographic-phonological regularities in a quasi-regular writing system: An integrated behavioral/computational/neurobiological approachP20HD091013 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COMPTON, DONALD L · 2017 to 2025
$4.2M
Neurobiological predictors of spoken and written language learningR01HD065794 · NICHD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI PUGH, KENNETH R. · 2011 to 2015
$3.5M
Neurochemistry as a moderator of brain networks for readingR01HD086168 · NICHD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI HOEFT, FUMIKO, PUGH, KENNETH R. · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD001994NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD070837NICHD NIH HHS P20 HD091013NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065794NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086168NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD090153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiteracy acquisition is a demanding process that induces significant changes in the brain, especially in the spoken and written language networks. Nevertheless, large-scale paediatric fMRI studies are still limited.

methodsWe analyzed fMRI data to show how individual differences in reading performance correlate with brain activation for speech and print in 111 children attending kindergarten or first grade and examined group differences between a matched subset of emergent-readers and prereaders.

resultsAcross the entire cohort, individual differences analysis revealed that reading skill was positively correlated with the magnitude of activation difference between words and symbol strings in left superior temporal, inferior frontal and fusiform gyri. Group comparisons of the matched subset of pre- and emergent-readers showed higher activity for emergent-readers in left inferior frontal, precentral, and postcentral gyri. Individual differences in activation for natural versus vocoded speech were also positively correlated with reading skill, primarily in the left temporal cortex. However, in contrast to studies on adult illiterates, group comparisons revealed higher activity in prereaders compared to readers in the frontal lobes. Print-speech coactivation was observed only in readers and individual differences analyses revealed a positive correlation between convergence and reading skill in the left superior temporal sulcus.

conclusionsThese results emphasise that a child's brain undergoes several modifications to both visual and oral language systems in the process of learning to read. They also suggest that print-speech convergence is a hallmark of acquiring literacy.

Indexed as

AchievementReadingBrainBrain MappingChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSpeech PerceptionfMRIliteracyprereadersprint-speech convergencereading acquisition

Identifiers

PMID28691732
PMCPMC5729096
OpenAlexW2735945627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.