Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28691442›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2017

Acceptability of woman-delivered HIV self-testing to the male partner, and additional interventions: a qualitative study of antenatal care participants in Malawi.

Augustine Talumba Choko, Moses Kelly Kumwenda, Cheryl Case Johnson, Doreen Wongera Sakala, Maria Chifuniro Chikalipo, Katherine Fielding, Jeremiah Chikovore, Nicola Desmond, Elizabeth Lucy Corbett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Augustine Talumba ChokoTB/HIV Theme, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Moses Kelly KumwendaTB/HIV Theme, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Cheryl Case JohnsonDepartment of HIV, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Doreen Wongera SakalaTB/HIV Theme, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Maria Chifuniro ChikalipoCollege of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Katherine FieldingInfectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jeremiah ChikovoreHIV/AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Infections & TB, Human Sciences Research Council, Durban, South Africa.
Nicola DesmondTB/HIV Theme, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Elizabeth Lucy CorbettTB/HIV Theme, Malawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the era of ambitious HIV targets, novel HIV testing models are required for hard-to-reach groups such as men, who remain underserved by existing services. Pregnancy presents a unique opportunity for partners to test for HIV, as many pregnant women will attend antenatal care (ANC). We describe the views of pregnant women and their male partners on HIV self-test kits that are woman-delivered, alone or with an additional intervention.

methodsA formative qualitative study to inform the design of a multi-arm multi-stage cluster-randomized trial, comprised of six focus group discussions and 20 in-depth interviews, was conducted. ANC attendees were purposively sampled on the day of initial clinic visit, while men were recruited after obtaining their contact information from their female partners. Data were analysed using content analysis, and our interpretation is hypothetical as participants were not offered self-test kits.

resultsProviding HIV self-test kits to pregnant women to deliver to their male partners was highly acceptable to both women and men. Men preferred this approach compared with standard facility-based testing, as self-testing fits into their lifestyles which were characterized by extreme day-to-day economic pressures, including the need to raise money for food for their household daily. Men and women emphasized the need for careful communication before and after collection of the self-test kits in order to minimize the potential for intimate partner violence although physical violence was perceived as less likely to occur. Most men stated a preference to first self-test alone, followed by testing as a couple. Regarding interventions for optimizing linkage following self-testing, both men and women felt that a fixed financial incentive of approximately USD$2 would increase linkage. However, there were concerns that financial incentives of greater value may lead to multiple pregnancies and lack of child spacing. In this low-income setting, a lottery incentive was considered overly disappointing for those who receive nothing. Phone call reminders were preferred to short messaging service.

conclusionsWoman-delivered HIV self-testing through ANC was acceptable to pregnant women and their male partners. Feedback on additional linkage enablers will be used to alter pre-planned trial arms.

Indexed as

Prenatal CareSelf CareAdultAmbulatory CareFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFocus GroupsHIV InfectionsHumansMalawiMalePregnancyQualitative ResearchReagent Kits, DiagnosticSexual PartnersSpouse AbuseReagent Kits, DiagnosticANCfinancial incentivesHIVHIV self-testingMalawirapid HIV testsub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID28691442
PMCPMC5515040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.