Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28691434›Full record

ReviewJournal of the International AIDS Society2017

Universal antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected children: a review of the benefits and risks to consider during implementation.

Linda Barlow-Mosha, Victor Musiime, Mary-Ann Davies, Andrew J Prendergast, Philippa Musoke, George Siberry, Martina Penazzato

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimal Timing of Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation in Children and Adolescents With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Pulmonary Tuberculosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Linda Barlow-MoshaClinic Department, Makerere University John Hopkins University (MUJHU) Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda​.
Victor MusiimeDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Mary-Ann DaviesSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Andrew J PrendergastBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Philippa MusokeClinic Department, Makerere University John Hopkins University (MUJHU) Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda​.
George SiberryMaternal and Pediatric Infectious Disease Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Martina PenazzatoHIV Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland​.
MUJHU Research Collaboration · UGZero to Three · USNational Institutes of Health · USWorld Health Organization · CHZvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research · ZW

Funding

Observational Antiretroviral Studies In Southern Africa (OASIS) CollaborationU01AI069924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITAT BERN · PI Cleophas Chimbetete, Mary-Ann Davies · 2006 to 2026
$55.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069924World Health Organization
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection, recommended to start all HIV-infected children on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Here, we explore the possible benefits and risks of implementing universal ART for all HIV-infected children and adolescents and outline some of the key considerations that led to the 2016 revision of WHO guidelines.

methodsWe conducted a review of the published data from 2000 to 2016, to ascertain the clinical and programmatic benefits, as well as the risks of implementing universal ART for all children. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Universal ART for all children has the potential to increase treatment coverage, which in 2015 was only 51% globally, as well as providing several biological benefits, by preventing: premature death/loss to follow-up, progressive destruction of the immune system, poor growth and pubertal delay, poor neuro-cognitive outcomes and future burden to the health care system with complications of untreated HIV-infection. However, the strategy could be associated with risks, notably development of HIV drug resistance, antiretroviral drug toxicities and increased costs to an already stretched health system.

conclusionOverall, our findings suggest that the benefits could outweigh the risks and support universal ART for all HIV-infected children, but recognize that national programmes will need to put measures in place to minimize the risks if they choose to implement the strategy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-HIV AgentsChildHIV InfectionsHumansMaleRisk AssessmentAnti-HIV Agentsadolescentschildrenresource limited settingsreviewSub Saharan AfricaUniversal antiretroviral therapyWHO guidelines

Identifiers

PMID28691434
PMCPMC5527851
OpenAlexW2689870615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.