Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28691132›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

Randomized phase II placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of topical pure emu oil for joint pain related to adjuvant aromatase inhibitor use in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: JUST (Joints Under Study).

Arlene Chan, R De Boer, A Gan, P Willsher, R Martin, Y Zissiadis, K Miller, A Bauwens, D Hastrich

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arlene ChanBreast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia. arlenechan@me.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2135-2286
R De BoerBreast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia.
A GanBreast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia.
P WillsherBreast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia.
R MartinBreast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia.
Y ZissiadisBreast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia.
K MillerBreast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia.
A BauwensBreast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia.
D HastrichBreast Cancer Research Centre-WA, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAromatase inhibitors are standard of care in women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Published evidence demonstrates that adverse effects may have an impact on drug compliance, with arthralgias being one of the most commonly reported adverse effects.

methodsEligible patients were postmenopausal women who had experienced arthralgia following initiation of an aromatase inhibitor. Patients who experienced arthralgias following a minimum of a 3-month treatment on the aromatase inhibitor were randomized to emu oil or placebo oil. The primary endpoint was to assess for a reduction in pain as measured by a visual analogue score after 8 weeks of treatment.

resultsSeventy-three patients comprised the intent-to-treat population, and there was no statistically significant benefit with use of EO. However, there was a statistically significant improvement in pain (visual analogue score was -1.28; p < 0.001) and Brief Pain Inventory severity score -0.88 (p < 0.001), as well as functional interference (Brief Pain Inventory interference -1.10 (p < 0.001) for the entire population following an 8-week administration of EO or placebo oil.

conclusionsArthralgias, as a result of aromatase inhibitor use, may be ameliorated by the use of topical oil massaged onto the joint. Further research into interventions for this common side effect is needed.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, PharmaceuticAdministration, TopicalAdultAromatase InhibitorsArthralgiaBreast NeoplasmsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOilsPostmenopauseAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAromatase Inhibitorsemu OilOilsAromatase inhibitorArthralgiaEmu oil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.