ArticleBioMed research international2017
Article in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative transcriptome profiling and functional analysis of GmRAMOSA1 as a key regulator of adventitious shoot regeneration in soybean.Plant cell reports · 2026Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Editing in FAD2 Gene to Enhance Oil Quality in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill].PloS one · 2026Article
- Effect of Mowing on Wheat Growth at Seeding Stage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Analysis of correlation between seed vigour, germination and multiple shoot induction in soybean (Heliyon · 2021Article
- Towards Developing Drought-smart Soybeans.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- A Bitter-Sweet Story: Unraveling the Genes Involved in Quinolizidine Alkaloid Synthesis inFrontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- In Vitro Regeneration Potential of White LupinPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Commercial Soybean Cultivars.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Development of an efficient regeneration system for the precious and fast-growing timber treePlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soybean, a major legume crop, is the source of vegetable oil and protein. There is a need for transgenic approaches to breeding superior soybean varieties to meet future climate challenges. Efficient plant regeneration is a prerequisite for successful application of genetic transformation technology. Soybean cultivars are classified into different maturity groups based on photoperiod requirements. In this study, nine soybean varieties belonging to different maturity group were regenerated successfully from three different explants: half split hypocotyl, complete hypocotyl, and cotyledonary node. All the genotypes and explant types responded by producing adventitious shoots. Shoot induction potential ranged within 60-87%, 50-100%, and 75-100%, and regeneration rate ranged within 4.2-10, 2.7-4.2, and 2.6-10.5 shoots per explant using half split hypocotyl, complete hypocotyl, and cotyledonary explants, respectively, among all the tested genotypes. Bunya variety showed the best regeneration response using half split and complete hypocotyl explants and the PNR791 with cotyledonary node. The regenerated shoots were successfully rooted and acclimatized to glasshouse conditions. This study shows that commercial varieties of soybean are amenable to shoot regeneration with high regeneration frequencies and could be exploited for genetic transformation. Further, our results show no correlation between shoots regeneration capacity with the maturity grouping of the soybean cultivars tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.