ReviewSultan Qaboos University medical journal2017
Review in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- BenignOxford medical case reports · 2026Article
- Ovarian Low-Grade Mucinous Tumor Combined with Pseudo-Meigs' Syndrome: Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Meigs Syndrome and Elevated CA-125: Case Report and Literature Review of an Unusual Presentation Mimicking Ovarian Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Struma ovarii with massive ascites mimicking ovarian carcinoma treated with conservative laparoscopic surgery: a case report.Fukushima journal of medical science · 2023Article
- Struma Ovarii Associated with Ascites and Elevated CA125: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature.International journal of women's health · 2022Article
- Meigs' Versus Pseudo-Meigs' Syndrome: A Case of Pleural Effusion, Ascites, and Ovarian Mass.Cureus · 2020Article
- Precise preoperative diagnosis of struma ovarii with pseudo-Meigs' syndrome mimicking ovarian cancer with the combination ofJournal of ovarian research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The monodermal teratoma
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.