ArticleFertility research and practice2017
Fertility preservation training for obstetrics and gynecology fellows: a highly desired but non-standardized experience.
Article in Fertility research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fertility and infertility knowledge among physicians caring for women with rheumatic diseases is suboptimal: a cross-sectional survey.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Assessing Knowledge, Counseling, and Referral Patterns Regarding Fertility Preservation Before Gonadotoxic Treatments Among Physicians in the Military Health System.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2024Article
- Optimizing health literacy to facilitate reproductive health decision-making in adolescent and young adults with cancer.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2023Article
- Barriers to Oncofertility Care among Female Adolescent Cancer Patients in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- A View from the past into our collective future: the oncofertility consortium vision statement.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- US Women's Perceptions and Acceptance of New Reproductive Health Technologies.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Design of a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of a reproductive health survivorship care plan in young breast cancer survivors.Contemporary clinical trials · 2019Article
- A Survey Study of Attitude and Knowledge Regarding Female Fertility Preservation Among Reproductive Health Professionals in Fujian, China.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2019Article
- Review
- The National Physicians Cooperative: transforming fertility management in the cancer setting and beyond.Future oncology (London, England) · 2018Article
- Oncofertility-An emerging discipline rather than a special consideration.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite a large body of data suggesting that delivery of fertility care to cancer patients is inconsistent and frequently insufficient, there is a paucity of literature examining training in fertility preservation for those physicians expected to discuss options or execute therapy. The study objective was to compare fertility preservation training between Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility (REI) and Gynecologic Oncology (GYN ONC) fellows and assess the need for additional education in this field.
methodsA 38-item survey was administered to REI and GYN ONC fellows in the United states in April 2014. Survey items included
resultsSeventy-nine responses were received from 137 REI and 160 GYN ONC fellows (response rate 27%). REI fellows reported seeing significantly more fertility preservation patients and rated their training more favorably than GYN ONC fellows (48% of REI fellows versus 7% of GYN ONC fellows rated training as 'excellent',
conclusionSignificant variability exists in fertility preservation training for REI and GYN ONC fellows, with the greatest gap seen for GYN ONC fellows, both in perceived quality of fertility preservation training and number of fertility preservation patients seen. A majority of fellows in both disciplines support the idea of a standardized multi-disciplinary curriculum in fertility preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.