ArticleEcology and evolution2017
Evaluating hybridization capture with RAD probes as a tool for museum genomics with historical bird specimens.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybridization and Asymmetrical Introgression Between the Vulnerable Gray-Headed Chickadee and a More Abundant Congener, the Boreal Chickadee: Implications for Conservation.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Museomics and morphological analyses of historical and contemporary peninsular Italian wolf (Canis lupus italicus) samples.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hybridization ddRAD-sequencing and phenotypic analysis clarify the phylogeographic structure and evolution of an alpineFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Library preparation method and DNA source influence endogenous DNA recovery from 100-year-old avian museum specimens.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Performance and automation of ancient DNA capture with RNA hyRAD probes.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
- Facilitating population genomics of non-model organisms through optimized experimental design for reduced representation sequencing.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Using historical genome-wide DNA to unravel the confused taxonomy in a songbird lineage that is extinct in the wild.Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Natural history collections are critical resources for contemporary and future studies of urban evolution.Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Digging into the Genomic Past of Swiss Honey Bees by Whole-Genome Sequencing Museum Specimens.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Museomics identifies genetic erosion in two butterfly species across the 20th century in Finland.Molecular ecology resources · 2020Article
- Uneven Missing Data Skew Phylogenomic Relationships within the Lories and Lorikeets.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Spatial and temporal genetic dynamics of the grasshopperEcology and evolution · 2018Article
- Whole-genome amplification in double-digest RADseq results in adequate libraries but fewer sequenced loci.PeerJ · 2018Article
- Evaluating hybridization capture with RAD probes as a tool for museum genomics with historical bird specimens.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Laboratory techniques for high-throughput sequencing have enhanced our ability to generate DNA sequence data from millions of natural history specimens collected prior to the molecular era, but remain poorly tested at shallower evolutionary time scales. Hybridization capture using restriction site-associated DNA probes (hyRAD) is a recently developed method for population genomics with museum specimens. The hyRAD method employs fragments produced in a restriction site-associated double digestion as the basis for probes that capture orthologous loci in samples of interest. While promising in that it does not require a reference genome, hyRAD has yet to be applied across study systems in independent laboratories. Here, we provide an independent assessment of the effectiveness of hyRAD on both fresh avian tissue and dried tissue from museum specimens up to 140 years old and investigate how variable quantities of input DNA affect sequencing, assembly, and population genetic inference. We present a modified bench protocol and bioinformatics pipeline, including three steps for detection and removal of microbial and mitochondrial DNA contaminants. We confirm that hyRAD is an effective tool for sampling thousands of orthologous SNPs from historic museum specimens to describe phylogeographic patterns. We find that modern DNA performs significantly better than historical DNA better during sequencing but that assembly performance is largely equivalent. We also find that the quantity of input DNA predicts %GC content of assembled contiguous sequences, suggesting PCR bias. We caution against sampling schemes that include taxonomic or geographic autocorrelation across modern and historic samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.