Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28690695›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Assessment of attitudes and practices of young Malaysian adults about antibiotics use: a cross-sectional study.

Mohamed A Hassali, Mohammad Arief, Fahad Saleem, Muhammad U Khan, Akram Ahmad, Warisha Mariam, Harika Bheemavarapu, Iizhar A Syed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Income level and antibiotic misuse: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohamed A HassaliDiscipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Penang (Malaysia). azmihassali@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-885X
Mohammad AriefDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University. Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia). mohammad.arief786@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6176-4619
Fahad SaleemDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, University of Balochistan. Quetta (Pakistan). fahaduob@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8100-8992
Muhammad U KhanFaculty of pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW (Australia). umair104@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0456-3938
Akram AhmadDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University. Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia). akrampharma67@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9998-5860
Warisha MariamDepartment of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College. New Delhi (India). warishamariam@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6480-3027
Harika BheemavarapuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Talla Padmavati College of Pharmacy. Warangal (India). hariikabhimavarapu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3381-5658
Iizhar A SyedDepartment of Pharmacy, Ibn Sina College of pharmacy. Jeddah (Saudi Arabia). iizharahmedsyed@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6823-2356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study was aimed to evaluate the practices and attitudes of young Malaysian adults towards the use of antibiotics, and to determine the socioeconomic factors associated with the antibiotic use.

methodsA survey was carried in Cheras community by approaching a conveniently selected sample of 480 participants. A pre-tested questionnaire was used for data collection.

resultOf 480 participants approached, 400 agreed to participate in this study, giving a response rate of 83.3%. The study results showed that 42.75% of the participants exhibited poor attitudes towards antibiotic usage. Chinese race and high income were significantly associated with the positive attitudes towards antibiotic usage. It is shown that the practice of the participants towards antibiotics was relatively poor. The majority of participants agreed that they do not consult a doctor for minor illnesses (64%). The main reason for not consulting a doctor was the high fees of consultation (34.25%) and the inconvenience of visit (29.25%). However, a large proportion of respondents (77.5%) agreed that there is a need to enhance antibiotic education among public.

conclusionThe study results identified some crucial gaps in the attitudes and practices of Cheras community about the use of antibiotics. Thus, improving the public knowledge and changing their attitude towards antibiotic use along with proper interventions to regulate the ease of their availability would play a significant role for the effective use of antibiotics in the community.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAttitudesCross-Sectional StudiesHealth KnowledgeMalaysiaPatient Medication KnowledgePracticeSelf MedicationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28690695
PMCPMC5499350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.