Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28690680›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2017

From grass to gas: microbiome dynamics of grass biomass acidification under mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures.

Christian Abendroth, Claudia Simeonov, Juli Peretó, Oreto Antúnez, Raquel Gavidia, Olaf Luschnig, Manuel Porcar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christian AbendrothCavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Universitat de València, C/ José Beltran 2, 46980 Paterna, Spain.
Claudia SimeonovRobert Boyle Institut e.V., Im Steinfeld 10, 07751 Jena, Germany.
Juli PeretóCavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Universitat de València, C/ José Beltran 2, 46980 Paterna, Spain.
Oreto AntúnezServei Central de Suport a la Investigació Experimental (SCSIE), Universitat de València-CSIC, Paterna, Spain.
Raquel GavidiaServei Central de Suport a la Investigació Experimental (SCSIE), Universitat de València-CSIC, Paterna, Spain.
Olaf LuschnigBio H2 Energy GmbH, Im Steinfeld 10, 07751 Jena, Germany.
Manuel PorcarCavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Universitat de València, C/ José Beltran 2, 46980 Paterna, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeparating acidification and methanogenic steps in anaerobic digestion processes can help to optimize the process and contribute to producing valuable sub-products such as methane, hydrogen and organic acids. However, the full potential of this technology has not been fully explored yet. To assess the underlying fermentation process in more detail, a combination of high-throughput sequencing and proteomics on the acidification step of plant material (grass) at both mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures (37 and 55 °C, respectively) was applied for the first time.

resultsHigh-strength liquor from acidified grass biomass exhibited a low biodiversity, which differed greatly depending on temperature. It was dominated by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes at 37 °C, and by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria at 55 °C. At the methane stage,

conclusionOur results are the first multi-omics characterisation of a two-stage biogas production system with separated acidification and suggest that screening approaches targeting specific taxa such as

Identifiers

PMID28690680
PMCPMC5496412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.