Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28690620›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

Sugarcane Water Stress Tolerance Mechanisms and Its Implications on Developing Biotechnology Solutions.

Thais H S Ferreira, Max S Tsunada, Denis Bassi, Pedro Araújo, Lucia Mattiello, Giovanna V Guidelli, Germanna L Righetto, Vanessa R Gonçalves, Prakash Lakshmanan, Marcelo Menossi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
29.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhanced expression of theGM crops & food · 2026
    Article
  2. Adaptive Responses of Tropical Crops: A Multi-Scale Omics Integrated Perspective.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. PromoterEco-Environment & Health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thais H S FerreiraFunctional Genome Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, State University of CampinasCampinas, Brazil.
Max S TsunadaFunctional Genome Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, State University of CampinasCampinas, Brazil.
Denis BassiFunctional Genome Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, State University of CampinasCampinas, Brazil.
Pedro AraújoFunctional Genome Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, State University of CampinasCampinas, Brazil.
Lucia MattielloFunctional Genome Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, State University of CampinasCampinas, Brazil.
Giovanna V GuidelliFunctional Genome Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, State University of CampinasCampinas, Brazil.
Germanna L RighettoFunctional Genome Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, State University of CampinasCampinas, Brazil.
Vanessa R GonçalvesFunctional Genome Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, State University of CampinasCampinas, Brazil.
Prakash LakshmananSugar Research AustraliaBrisbane, QLD, Australia.
Marcelo MenossiFunctional Genome Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, State University of CampinasCampinas, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRSugar Research Australia (Australia) · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugarcane is a unique crop with the ability to accumulate high levels of sugar and is a commercially viable source of biomass for bioelectricity and second-generation bioethanol. Water deficit is the single largest abiotic stress affecting sugarcane productivity and the development of water use efficient and drought tolerant cultivars is an imperative for all major sugarcane producing countries. This review summarizes the physiological and molecular studies on water deficit stress in sugarcane, with the aim to help formulate more effective research strategies for advancing our knowledge on genes and mechanisms underpinning plant response to water stress. We also overview transgenic studies in sugarcane, with an emphasis on the potential strategies to develop superior sugarcane varieties that improve crop productivity in drought-prone environments.

Indexed as

abscisic acidbioethanoldroughtlipid peroxidationsugarcanetransgenic

Identifiers

PMID28690620
PMCPMC5481406
OpenAlexW2661454563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.