Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28690494›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2017

The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic.

Shuman He, Holly F B Teagle, Craig A Buchman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Peripheral neural synchrony in post-lingually deafened adult cochlear implant users.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuman HeCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research HospitalOmaha, NE, United States.
Holly F B TeagleDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel Hill, NC, United States.
Craig A BuchmanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington UniversitySt. Louis, MO, United States.

Funding

The Impact of Mild Hearing Loss on Auditory Perception in Complex EnvironmentsP20GM109023 · NIGMS · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS' HOME · PI LEIBOLD, LORI J. · 2014 to 2023
$23.4M
Electrically-evoked neural responses in children with auditory neuropathyR03DC013153 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HE, SHUMAN · 2013 to 2015
$454k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013153NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) represents the synchronous firing of a population of electrically stimulated auditory nerve fibers. It can be directly recorded on a surgically exposed nerve trunk in animals or from an intra-cochlear electrode of a cochlear implant. In the past two decades, the eCAP has been widely recorded in both animals and clinical patient populations using different testing paradigms. This paper provides an overview of recording methodologies and response characteristics of the eCAP, as well as its potential applications in research and clinical situations. Relevant studies are reviewed and implications for clinicians are discussed.

Indexed as

auditory nerveclinical applicationcochlear implant outcomeelectrically evoked compound action potentialstimulating paradigm

Identifiers

PMID28690494
PMCPMC5481377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.