Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28690396›Full record

ReviewBiomarker insights2017

Prognostic Impact of Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor Expression in Pancreatic Cancer: Malignant Versus Stromal Cells.

Susanna Wl de Geus, Victor M Baart, Martin C Boonstra, Peter Jk Kuppen, Hendrica Ajm Prevoo, Andrew P Mazar, Bert A Bonsing, Hans Morreau, Cornelis Jh van de Velde, Alexander L Vahrmeijer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomarker insights, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Connecting impaired fibrinolysis and dyslipidemia.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: The Dawn of the Era of Nuclear Medicine?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susanna Wl de GeusDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Victor M BaartDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Martin C BoonstraDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter Jk KuppenDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hendrica Ajm PrevooDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Andrew P MazarMonopar Therapeutics Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA.
Bert A BonsingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hans MorreauDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cornelis Jh van de VeldeDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alexander L VahrmeijerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cornelis Fm SierDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has been proposed as a potential prognostic factor for various malignancies. The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic value of uPAR expression in neoplastic and stromal cells of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor expression was determined by immunohistochemistry in 122 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the association with survival. Respectively 66%, 82% and 62% of patients with pancreatic cancer expressed uPAR in neoplastic cells, stromal, and in both combined. Multivariate analysis showed a significant inverse association between uPAR expression in both neoplastic and stromal cells and overall survival. The prognostic impact of uPAR in stromal cells is substantial, but not as pronounced as that of uPAR expression in neoplastic cells. This study suggests a role for uPAR as a biomarker to single out higher risk subgroups of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

immunohistochemistryPancreatic adenocarcinomastromasurvivaluPAR

Identifiers

PMID28690396
PMCPMC5484551
OpenAlexW2687156112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.