Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28690382›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2017

QSAR based predictive modeling for anti-malarial molecules.

Deepak R Bharti, Andrew M Lynn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deepak R BhartiSchool of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-67.
Andrew M LynnSchool of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-67.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria is a predominant infectious disease, with a global footprint, but especially severe in developing countries in the African subcontinent. In recent years, drug-resistant malaria has become an alarming factor, and hence the requirement of new and improved drugs is more crucial than ever before. One of the promising locations for antimalarial drug target is the apicoplast, as this organelle does not occur in humans. The apicoplast is associated with many unique and essential pathways in many Apicomplexan pathogens, including Plasmodium. The use of machine learning methods is now commonly available through open source programs. In the present work, we describe a standard protocol to develop molecular descriptor based predictive models (QSAR models), which can be further utilized for the screening of large chemical libraries. This protocol is used to build models using training data sourced from apicoplast specific bioassays. Multiple model building methods are used including Generalized Linear Models (GLM), Random Forest (RF), C5.0 implementation of a decision tree, Support Vector Machines (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbour and Naive Bayes. Methods to evaluate the accuracy of the model building method are included in the protocol. For the given dataset, the C5.0, SVM and RF perform better than other methods, with comparable accuracy over the test data.

Indexed as

apicoplastMalariapredictive model buildingR statistical package

Identifiers

PMID28690382
PMCPMC5498782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.