Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28690115›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture.

Adam Conn, Ullas V Pedmale, Joanne Chory, Charles F Stevens, Saket Navlakha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 3D-OGT: 3D organ growth tracking with minimum segmentation.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Deep learning for three-dimensional (3D) plant phenomics.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A Statistical Growth Property of Plant Root Architectures.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The plant body as a network of semi-autonomous agents: a review.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam ConnIntegrative Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Ullas V PedmaleHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Plant Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Joanne ChoryHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Plant Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Charles F StevensMolecular Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Saket NavlakhaIntegrative Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: navlakha@salk.edu.

Funding

INITIAL EVENTS IN PHOTORECEPTOR SIGNALINGR01GM052413 · NIGMS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI CHORY, JOANNE · 1995 to 2016
$5.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM052413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant architectures can be characterized statistically by their spatial density function, which specifies the probability of finding a branch at each location in the territory occupied by a plant. Using high-precision 3D scanning, we analyzed 557 plant shoot architectures, representing three species, grown across three to five environmental conditions, and through 20-30 developmental time points. We found two elegant properties in the spatial density functions of these architectures: all functions could be nearly modified in one direction without affecting the density in orthogonal directions (called "separability"), and all functions shared the same underlying shape, aside from stretching and compression (called "self-similarity"). Surprisingly, despite their striking visual diversity, we discovered that all architectures could be described as variations on a single underlying function: a Gaussian density function truncated at roughly two SDs. We also observed systematic variation in the spatial density functions across species, growth conditions, and time, which suggests functional specialization despite following the same general design form.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalNicotianaPlant ShootsSolanum lycopersicumSorghum3D scanningbranch densitygrowth principlesplant architecturesself-similarityseparability

Identifiers

PMID28690115
PMCPMC6130893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.