Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28690110›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

Mapping Load-Bearing in the Mammalian Spindle Reveals Local Kinetochore Fiber Anchorage that Provides Mechanical Isolation and Redundancy.

Mary Williard Elting, Manu Prakash, Dylan B Udy, Sophie Dumont

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mechanisms underlying spindle assembly and robustness.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Coupling of microtubule bundles isolates them from local disruptions to set the structural stability of the anaphase spindle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Anaphase B: Long-standing models meet new concepts.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Chemical tools for dissecting cell division.Nature chemical biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Williard EltingDepartment of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Manu PrakashDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Dylan B UdyDepartment of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Sophie DumontDepartment of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. Electronic address: sophie.dumont@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USStanford University · US

Funding

Rewiring cellular architecture to probe mechanical signal processing at kinetochoresDP2GM119177 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DUMONT, SOPHIE · 2015 to 2015
$2.4M
Spindle forces for chromosome movementR00GM094335 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DUMONT, SOPHIE · 2012 to 2014
$738k
NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM119177NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM094335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active forces generated at kinetochores move chromosomes, and the dynamic spindle must robustly anchor kinetochore fibers (k-fibers) to bear this load. The mammalian spindle bears the load of chromosome movement far from poles, but we do not know where and how-physically and molecularly-this load distributes across the spindle. In part, this is because probing spindle mechanics in live cells is difficult. Yet answering this question is key to understanding how the spindle generates and responds to force and performs its diverse mechanical functions. Here, we map load-bearing across the mammalian spindle in space-time and dissect local anchorage mechanics and mechanism. To do so, we laser-ablate single k-fibers at different spindle locations and in different molecular backgrounds and quantify the immediate relaxation of chromosomes, k-fibers, and microtubule speckles. We find that load redistribution is locally confined in all directions: along the first 3-4 μm from kinetochores, scaling with k-fiber length, and laterally within ∼2 μm of k-fiber sides, without detectable load sharing between neighboring k-fibers. A phenomenological model suggests that dense, transient crosslinks to the spindle along k-fibers bear the load of chromosome movement but that these connections do not limit the timescale of spindle reorganization. The microtubule crosslinker NuMA is needed for the local load-bearing observed, whereas Eg5 and PRC1 are not detectably required, suggesting specialization in mechanical function. Together, the data and model suggest that NuMA-mediated crosslinks locally bear load, providing mechanical isolation and redundancy while allowing spindle fluidity. These features are well suited to support robust chromosome segregation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineKineticsKinetochoresPotoroidaeSpindle Apparatuskinetochore fiberload-bearing modelmammalianmechanicsmicrotubulemitosisspindle

Identifiers

PMID28690110
PMCPMC5579025
OpenAlexW2952348314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.