Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28690041›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of arthroplasty2017

Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen as an Adjunct to Multimodal Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Jason B O'Neal, Andrew A Freiberg, Marc D Yelle, Yandong Jiang, Chengwei Zhang, Yin Gu, Xiangyi Kong, Wenling Jian, Wesley T O'Neal, Jingping Wang

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Effectiveness of oralWorld journal of orthopedics · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Management of Refractory Pain After Total Joint Replacement.Current pain and headache reports · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Regional and Multimodal Analgesia to Reduce Opioid Use After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jason B O'NealDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Andrew A FreibergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marc D YelleDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Yandong JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Chengwei ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yin GuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiangyi KongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wenling JianDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Wesley T O'NealDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jingping WangDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USCentral South University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNDuke Medical Center · USEmory University · USSecond Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNShenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital · CN

Funding

TIPS: Training in Perioperative ScienceT32GM108554 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Eric J Delpire · 2014 to 2026
$3.7M
The Association between Acute Mental Stress and Electrocardiographic Left Atrial AbnormalitiesF32HL134290 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI O'NEAL, WESLEY T · 2016 to 2017
$122k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL134290NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM108554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen compared with its oral formulation for postoperative analgesia is unknown. We hypothesized that the addition of acetaminophen to a multimodal analgesia regimen would provide improved pain management in patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and that the effect of acetaminophen would be variable based on the route of delivery.

methodsThe study was a single-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of IV vs oral acetaminophen in patients undergoing unilateral TKA. One hundred seventy-four subjects were randomized to one of the 3 groups: IV acetaminophen group (IV group, n = 57) received 1 g IV acetaminophen and oral placebo before postanesthesia care unit (PACU) admission; oral acetaminophen group (PO group, n = 58) received 1 g oral acetaminophen and volume-matched IV normal saline; placebo group (Placebo group, n = 59) received oral placebo and volume-matched IV normal saline. Pain scores were obtained every 15 minutes during PACU stay. Average pain scores, maximum pain score, and pain scores before physical therapy were compared among the 3 groups. Secondary outcomes included total opiate consumption, time to PACU discharge, time to rescue analgesia, and time to breakthrough pain.

resultsThe average PACU pain score was similar in the IV group (0.56 ± 0.99 [mean ± standard deviation]) compared with the PO group (0.67 ± 1.20; P = .84) and Placebo group (0.58 ± 0.99; P = .71). Total opiate consumption at 6 hours (0.47 mg hydromorphone equivalents ± 0.56 vs 0.54 ± 0.53 vs 0.54 ± 0.61; P = .69) and at 24 hours (1.25 ± 1.30 vs 1.49 ± 1.34 vs 1.36 ± 1.31; P = .46) were also similar between the IV, PO, and Placebo groups. No significant differences were found between all groups for any other outcome.

conclusionNeither IV nor oral acetaminophen provides additional analgesia in the immediate postoperative period when administered as an adjunct to multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing TKA in the setting of a spinal anesthetic.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAdministration, IntravenousAdministration, OralAgedAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, SpinalArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHydromorphoneMaleMiddle AgedAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidHydromorphoneacetaminophenanalgesiaorthopedic surgerypostoperative managementtotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID28690041
PMCPMC5605416
OpenAlexW2615561876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.