Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28690000›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pain2017

"I'm Not Gonna Pull the Rug out From Under You": Patient-Provider Communication About Opioid Tapering.

Marianne S Matthias, Nicole L Johnson, Cleveland G Shields, Matthew J Bair, Palmer MacKie, Monica Huffman, Stewart C Alexander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pain, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Patients' perspectives about the role of primary healthcare providers in long-term opioid therapy: a qualitative study in Dutch primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marianne S MatthiasDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana; Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: mmatthia@iupui.edu.
Nicole L JohnsonDepartment of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Cleveland G ShieldsDepartment of Human Development & Family Studies, Regenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, Purdue Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Matthew J BairDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana; Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Palmer MacKieDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Monica HuffmanRegenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Stewart C AlexanderDepartment of Consumer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

Funding

Identifying Communicative Factors Affecting Opioid Management for Chronic PainR21DA037384 · NIDA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MATTHIAS, MARIANNE, SHIELDS, CLEVELAND GEORGE · 2015 to 2016
$324k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA037384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to increases in harms associated with prescription opioids, opioid prescribing has come under greater scrutiny, leading many health care organizations and providers to consider or mandate opioid dose reductions (tapering) for patients with chronic pain. Communicating about tapering can be difficult, particularly for patients receiving long-term opioids who perceive benefits and are using their medications as prescribed. Because of the importance of effective patient-provider communication for pain management and recent health system-level initiatives and provider practices to taper opioids, this study used qualitative methods to understand communication processes related to opioid tapering, to identify best practices and opportunities for improvement. Up to 3 clinic visits per patient were audio-recorded, and individual interviews were conducted with patients and their providers. Four major themes emerged: 1) explaining-patients needed to understand individualized reasons for tapering, beyond general, population-level concerns such as addiction potential, 2) negotiating-patients needed to have input, even if it was simply the rate of tapering, 3) managing difficult conversations-when patients and providers did not reach a shared understanding, difficulties and misunderstandings arose, and 4) nonabandonment-patients needed to know that their providers would not abandon them throughout the tapering process. PERSPECTIVE: Although opioid tapering can be challenging, helping patients to understand individualized reasons for tapering, encouraging patients to have input into the process, and assuring patients they would not be abandoned all appear to facilitate optimal communication about tapering.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainFearFemaleHealth CommunicationHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationPrecision MedicineAnalgesics, OpioidChronic painopioidsopioid taperingpatient-centered carepatient-provider communication

Identifiers

PMID28690000
PMCPMC6219456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.