Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28689511›Full record

Trial reportEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2019

Evaluating feasibility and acceptability of a group WHO trans-diagnostic intervention for women with common mental disorders in rural Pakistan: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.

M N Khan, S U Hamdani, A Chiumento, K Dawson, R A Bryant, M Sijbrandij, H Nazir, P Akhtar, A Masood, D Wang and 4 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03359486 nacompletednot on this map

Pilot Feasibility Study of Focused Psychosocial Support to Improve the Psychosocial Well-being and Functioning of Adults Affected by Humanitarian Crisis in Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorge Washington UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled120ConditionsDepressionArmsGroup problem management plus, Enhanced treatment as usual
NCT03747055 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Group Focused Psychosocial Support to Improve the Psychosocial Well-being and Functioning of Adults Affected by Humanitarian Crisis in Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorge Washington UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled611ConditionsDepression, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Psychological DistressArmsGroup problem management plus, Enhanced treatment as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

M N KhanKhyber Medical University,Institute of Public Health & Social Sciences (IPH&SS),10-B,Near ICMS,Phase V,Hayatabad,Peshawar,Pakistan.
S U HamdaniHuman Development Research Foundation,Islamabad,Pakistan.
A ChiumentoUniversity of Liverpool,Liverpool,UK.
K DawsonUniversity of New South Wales,Sydney,Australia.
R A BryantUniversity of New South Wales,Sydney,Australia.
M SijbrandijVU University Amsterdam,Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
H NazirHuman Development Research Foundation,Islamabad,Pakistan.
P AkhtarHuman Development Research Foundation,Islamabad,Pakistan.
A MasoodHuman Development Research Foundation,Islamabad,Pakistan.
D WangLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine,Liverpool,UK.
E WangQueen Mary University of London,UK.
I UddinBacha Khan Medical College,Mardan,Pakistan.
M van OmmerenDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse,World Health Organisation,Geneva,Switzerland.
A RahmanHuman Development Research Foundation,Islamabad,Pakistan.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this feasibility trial was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the locally adapted Group Problem Management Plus (PM+) intervention for women in the conflict affected settings in Swat, Pakistan.

methodsThis mixed-methods study incorporated a quantitative component consisting of a two arm cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial, and qualitative evaluation of the acceptability of the Group PM+ to a range of stakeholder groups. For the quantitative component, on average from each of the 20 Lady Health Workers (LHWs) catchment area (20 clusters), six women were screened and recruited for the trial with score of >2 on the General Health Questionnaire and score of >16 on the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule. These LHW clusters were randomised on a 1 : 1 allocation ratio using a computer-based software through a simple randomisation method to the Group PM+ intervention or Enhanced Usual Care. The Group PM+ intervention consisted of five weekly sessions of 2 h duration delivered by local non-specialist females under supervision. The primary outcome was individual psychological distress, measured by levels of anxiety and depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 7th week after baseline. Secondary outcomes include symptoms of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), general psychological profile, levels of functioning and generalised psychological distress. Intervention acceptability was explored through in-depth interviews.

resultsThe results show that lay-helpers with no prior mental health experience can be trained to achieve the desired competency to successfully deliver the intervention in community settings under supervision. There was a good intervention uptake, with Group PM+ considered useful by participants, their families and lay-helpers. The outcome evaluation, which was not based on a large enough study to identify statistically significant results, indicated statistically significant improvements in depression, anxiety, general psychological profile and functioning. The PTSD symptoms and depressive disorder scores showed a trend in favour of the intervention.

conclusionThis trial showed robust acceptance in the local settings with delivery by non-specialists under supervision by local trained females. The trial paves the way for further adaptation and exploration of the outcomes through larger-scale implementation and definitive randomised controlled trials in the local settings.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAnxietyArmed ConflictsCommunity Mental Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareDepressionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedPakistanPsychotherapy, GroupQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeDepressiongroup therapyother psychosocial techniques/treatmentsrandomised controlled trialswomen

Identifiers

PMID28689511
PMCPMC6998939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.