Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28689317›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2018

Intentional binding of two effects.

Miriam Ruess, Roland Thomaschke, Carola Haering, Dorit Wenke, Andrea Kiesel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Distracted to a fault: Attention, actions, and time perception.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social Agency as a continuum.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021
    Review
  8. Sense of Agency in Multi-Step Actions.Advances in cognitive psychology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miriam RuessCognition, Action, and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstr. 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany. ruess@psychologie.uni-freiburg.de.
Roland ThomaschkeCognition, Action, and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstr. 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany.
Carola HaeringDepartment of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-University of Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Dorit WenkeAllgemeine Psychologie und Methodenlehre, PFH Private University of Applied Sciences Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Andrea KieselCognition, Action, and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstr. 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KI.1388/3-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An action that produced an effect is perceived later in time compared to an action that did not produce an effect. Likewise, the effect of an action is perceived earlier in time compared to a stimulus that was not produced by an action. Despite numerous studies on this phenomenon-referred to as Intentional Binding effect (IB)-the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Typically, IB is investigated in settings where the action produces just one single effect, whereas in everyday action contexts, it rather causes a sequence of effects before leading to the desired outcome. Therefore, we investigated IB of two consecutive effects. We observed substantially more IB of a first effect tone compared to a second tone. This pattern was observed for second tones that were temporally predictable (Exp. 1) or not (Exp. 2 and 3). Interestingly, the second tone yielded stronger IB when it was less delayed (Exp. 4). Thus, also an event occurring later in an unfolding action-effect sequence can be bound to its causing action, but it might be less bound to the action than a first effect. Instead of the fact that it is the second of two consecutive effects, this, however, rather seems to be influenced by the longer delay of a second and, therefore, later occurring effect.

Indexed as

IntentionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceTime PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.