Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28689283›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2017

Diffusion-weighted imaging for the cellularity assessment and matrix characterization of soft tissue tumour.

Tiziana Robba, Vito Chianca, Domenico Albano, Valeria Clementi, Raimondo Piana, Alessandra Linari, Alessandro Comandone, Guido Regis, Maurizio Stratta, Carlo Faletti and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multimodal Imaging of Hypoxia, Metabolism and pH in Feline Sarcoma Using HyperpolarizedAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Theranostics · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Pelvic floor dysfunctions: how to image patients?Japanese journal of radiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tiziana RobbaDipartimento di Radiologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico, Via Zuretti 29, 10126, Torino, Italy.
Vito ChiancaDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università degli studi Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli, Italy. vitochia@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2279-5559
Domenico AlbanoSezione di Scienze Radiologiche, DIBIMED, Università of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Valeria ClementiOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Via Don A. Sempreboni, 5, 37024, Negrar, Italy.
Raimondo PianaDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico, Via Zuretti 29, 10126, Torino, Italy.
Alessandra LinariDepartment of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza-OIRM, piazza Polonia 94, 10126, Torino, Italy.
Alessandro ComandoneDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gradenigo Hospital, Corso Regina Margherita 8, 10153, Torino, Italy.
Guido RegisDipartimento di Radiologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico, Via Zuretti 29, 10126, Torino, Italy.
Maurizio StrattaCentro diagnostico J-Medical, via Druento 153/56, 10151, Torino, Italy.
Carlo FalettiUnità di Diagnostica per Immagini, Casa di cure Fornaca, Corso Vittorio Emanuele 91, 10126, Torino, Italy.
Alda BorrèDipartimento di Radiologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico, Via Zuretti 29, 10126, Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is able to investigate the histological features of soft tissue tumours.

methodsWe reviewed MRIs of soft tissue tumours performed from 2012 to 2015 to calculate the average ADCs. We included 46 patients (27 male; mean age: 57 years, range 12-85 years) with histologically proven soft tissue tumours (10 benign, 2 intermediate 34 malignant) grouped into eight tumour type classes. An experienced pathologist assigned a semi-quantitative cellularity score (very high, high, medium and low) and tumour grading. The t test, ANOVA and linear regression were used to correlate ADC with clinicopathological data. Approximate receiver operating characteristic curves were created to predict possible uses of ADC to differentiate benign from malignant tumours.

resultsThere was a significant difference (p < 0.01) in ADCs between these three groups excluding myxoid sarcomas. A significant difference was also evident between the tumour type classes (p < 0.001), grade II and III myxoid lesions (p < 0.05), tumour grading classes (p < 0.001) and cellularity scores classes (p < 0.001), with the lowest ADCs in the very high cellularity. While the linear regression analysis showed a significant relationship between ADC and tumour cellularity (r = 0.590, p ≤ 0.05) and grading (r = 0.437, p ≤ 0.05), no significant relationship was found with age, gender, tumour size and histological subtype. An optimal cut-off ADC value of 1.45 × 10

conclusionsDWI may offer adjunctive information about soft tissue tumours, but its clinical role is still to be defined.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyChildDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingSoft Tissue NeoplasmsDiffusionMR imagingSoft tissueTumour

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.