Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28689281›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

Optimal FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters for risk stratification in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results from the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial.

Ali Salavati, Fenghai Duan, Bradley S Snyder, Bo Wei, Sina Houshmand, Benjapa Khiewvan, Adam Opanowski, Charles B Simone, Barry A Siegel, Mitchell Machtay and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Integration of Circulating Tumor DNA and Metabolic Parameters onAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Semiquantitative parameters ofBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Clinical and prognostic value of tumor volumetric parameters in melanoma patients undergoingCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Cancers · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ali SalavatiDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Salav006@umn.edu.
Fenghai DuanDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Bradley S SnyderCenter for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Bo WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sina HoushmandDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Benjapa KhiewvanDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Adam OpanowskiAmerican College of Radiology, ACR Center for Research and Innovation, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Charles B SimoneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Barry A SiegelMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St, Louis, MO, USA.
Mitchell MachtayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Abass AlaviDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Abass.Alavi@uphs.upenn.edu.

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
ARRA - ADOPT New Technologies for RDC/CDMSU01CA080098 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI SCHNALL, MITCHELL D. · 1999 to 2011
$182.7M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
BIOSTATISTICS DATA MANAGEMENT CENTER FOR ACROINU01CA079778 · NCI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI GATSONIS, CONSTANTINE A. · 1999 to 2011
$48.6M
Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115677 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROUNDS, SHARON IRENE SMITH · 2016 to 2025
$45.0M
American College of Radiology Imaging NetworkU10CA080098 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI SCHNALL, MITCHELL D. · 2012 to 2013
$9.4M
Biostatistics Data Management Center for ACRINU10CA079778 · NCI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI GATSONIS, CONSTANTINE A. · 2013 to 2013
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA079778NCI NIH HHS U01 CA080098NCI NIH HHS U10 CA079778NCI NIH HHS U10 CA080098NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn recent years, multiple studies have demonstrated the value of volumetric FDG-PET/CT parameters as independent prognostic factors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to determine the optimal cut-off points of pretreatment volumetric FDG-PET/CT parameters in predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced NSCLC and to recommend imaging biomarkers appropriate for routine clinical applications.

methodsPatients with inoperable stage IIB/III NSCLC enrolled in ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 were included. Pretreatment FDG-PET scans were quantified using semiautomatic adaptive contrast-oriented thresholding and local-background partial-volume-effect-correction algorithms. For each patient, the following indices were measured: metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), SUVmax, SUVmean, partial-volume-corrected TLG (pvcTLG), and pvcSUVmean for the whole-body, primary tumor, and regional lymph nodes. The association between each index and patient outcome was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Optimal cut-off points were estimated using recursive binary partitioning in a conditional inference framework and used in Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank testing. The discriminatory ability of each index was examined using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and corresponding area under the curve (AUC(t)).

resultsThe study included 196 patients. Pretreatment whole-body and primary tumor MTV, TLG, and pvcTLG were independently prognostic of OS. Optimal cut-off points were 175.0, 270.9, and 35.5 cm

conclusionWe demonstrated that pretreatment whole-body and primary tumor volumetric FDG-PET/CT parameters, including MTV, TLG, and pvcTLG, are strongly prognostic for OS in patients with locally advanced NSCLC, and have similar discriminatory ability. Therefore, we believe that, after validation in future trials, the derived optimal cut-off points for primary tumor volumetric FDG-PET/CT parameters, or their more refined versions, could be incorporated into routine clinical practice, and may provide more accurate prognostication and staging based on tumor metabolic features.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisFluorodeoxyglucose F18Clinical trialFDG-PETMetabolic tumor volumeNon-small cell lung cancerRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID28689281
PMCPMC5648620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.