Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28689250›Full record

Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

Multicenter, cross-sectional observational study of the impact of neuropathic pain on quality of life in cancer patients.

So Yeon Oh, Sang Won Shin, Su-Jin Koh, Sang Byung Bae, Hyun Chang, Jung Han Kim, Hyo Jung Kim, Young Seon Hong, Keon Uk Park, Jeanno Park and 19 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Neuropathic Pain in Cancer: What Are the Current Guidelines?Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. A structural equation modeling approach to understanding physical function of terminal cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Which factors can aid clinicians to identify a risk of pain during the following month in patients with bone metastases? A longitudinal analyses.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  16. Long-term low-dose morphine for patients with moderate cancer pain is predominant factor effecting clinically meaningful pain reduction.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  17. Neuropathic cancer pain: prevalence, pathophysiology, and management.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

So Yeon OhInternal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, South Korea.
Sang Won ShinMedical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73, Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136-705, Republic of Korea. shinsw@kumc.or.kr.
Su-Jin KohInternal Medicine, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea.
Sang Byung BaeInternal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, South Korea.
Hyun ChangInternal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Soengnam-Si, South Korea.
Jung Han KimInternal Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyo Jung KimInternal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, South Korea.
Young Seon HongInternal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Keon Uk ParkInternal Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, Daegu, South Korea.
Jeanno ParkInternal Medicine, Bobath Memorial Hospital, KyungGi, Soengnam-Si, South Korea.
Kyung Hee LeeInternal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Na Ri LeeInternal Medicine, Chonbuk National University College of Medicine, Chonbuk, South Korea.
Jung Lim LeeInternal Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, South Korea.
Joung Soon JangInternal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Dae Sik HongInternal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, South Korea.
Seung-Sei LeeInternal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Sun Kyung BaekInternal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Dae Ro ChoiInternal Medicine, Hallym University Chuncheon Medical Center, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Jooseop ChungInternal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, South Korea.
Sang Cheul OhInternal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hye Sook HanInternal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Chungbuk, South Korea.
Hwan Jung YunInternal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Chungnam, South Korea.
Sun Jin SymInternal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea.
So Young YoonInternal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
In Sil ChoiInternal Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Byoung Yong ShimInternal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, South Korea.
Seok Yun KangDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.
Sung Rok KimInternal Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyun Joo KimCorporate Affairs & Health and Value, Pfizer Pharmaceutical Korea Ltd., Seoul, South Korea.
Ajou University · KRBobath memorial hospital · KRBucheon University · KRCatholic University of Korea · KRChung-Ang University · KRChungbuk National University · KRChungnam National University · KRDaegu Fatima Hospital · KRGachon University Gil Medical Center · KRHallym University · KRHallym University Medical Center · KRHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital · KRInje University Sanggye Paik Hospital · KRJeonbuk National University · KRKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KRKeimyung University Dongsan Medical Center · KRKonkuk University Medical Center · KRKorea University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRKyung Hee University Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeuropathic cancer pain (NCP) is a common and potentially debilitating symptom in cancer patients. We investigated the prevalence of NCP, as well as its management and association with QOL.

methodsCancer patients with pain ≥1 on the visual analogue scale (VAS) were surveyed with the Douleur Neuropathique (DN4) questionnaire, the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), and the EuroQOL five dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire. The associations between NCP and pain severity or NCP and QOL, while controlling for variables relevant to QOL, were then analyzed.

resultsA total of 2003 patients were enrolled in this survey; the prevalence of NCP was 36.0% (n = 722, 95% CI, 32.5-39.5). We found that NCP in cancer patients was closely correlated to a higher pain severity (BPI-SF; 4.96 ± 1.94 versus 4.24 ± 2.02, p < 0.001), and in patients with NCP, pain more severely interfered with daily living, as compared to those without NCP (BPI-SF; 4.86 ± 2.71 versus 4.41 ± 2.87, p < 0.001). Patients with NCP also had worse QOL than those without NCP, as measured by EQ-5D index score (0.47 ± 0.30 vs. 0.51 ± 0.30, p = 0.005), and this was confirmed using multivariate analysis (p < 0.001), even after controlling for other variables such as age, sex, disease stage, cancer duration, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and comorbidities. Importantly, adjuvant analgesics were used in less than half of patients with NCP (n = 358, 46.4%).

conclusionsWe found that NCP in cancer patients was significantly associated with a worsened QOL, and current management is inadequate. Therefore, future research aimed at developing improved strategies for management of NCP is required.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsCancer PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeuralgiaPain MeasurementPrevalenceQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesicsNeoplasmNeuropathic painPain managementQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID28689250
PMCPMC5658461
OpenAlexW2731716480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.