Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28689248›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2017

Daily self-weighing and weight gain prevention: a longitudinal study of college-aged women.

Diane L Rosenbaum, Hallie M Espel, Meghan L Butryn, Fengqing Zhang, Michael R Lowe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Eating pathology and psychological outcomes in young adults in self-regulation interventions using daily self-weighing.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diane L RosenbaumDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. rdiane@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Hallie M EspelDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Meghan L ButrynDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Fengqing ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael R LoweDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

National Institutes of Health RO1 DK072982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Daily self-weighing has been suggested as an important factor for weight loss maintenance among samples with obesity. This study is a secondary analysis that examined daily self-weighing in association with weight and body composition outcomes over 2 years among young women with vulnerability for weight gain. Women (N = 294) of varying weight status completed self-weighing frequency questionnaires and weight was measured in the clinic at baseline, 6 months, 1, and 2 years; DXA scans were completed at baseline, 6 months and 2 years. Multilevel models examined the relationship between daily self-weighing (at any point in the study) and trajectories of BMI and body fat percentage. Daily self-weighing was associated with significant declines in BMI and body fat percent over time. Future research is needed to examine causal relations between daily self-weighing and weight gain prevention. Nonetheless, these data extend the possibility that daily self-weighing may be important for prevention of unwanted weight gain.

Indexed as

Body Weight MaintenanceHealth BehaviorWeight GainAdolescentBody CompositionBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesOverweightTime FactorsYoung AdultBody fat changeLongitudinalObesity preventionSelf-weighingWeight change

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.