Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28689169›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of ophthalmology2017

Leber congenital amaurosis/early-onset severe retinal dystrophy: clinical features, molecular genetics and therapeutic interventions.

Neruban Kumaran, Anthony T Moore, Richard G Weleber, Michel Michaelides

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 181 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
181citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

181 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 328 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Novel Genotype-Phenotype Correlations inOphthalmology science · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Restoring Sight: The Journey of AIPL1 from Discovery to Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review

121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Neruban KumaranUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Anthony T MooreUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Richard G WeleberCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Michel MichaelidesUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Moorfields Eye Hospital · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 099173/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) and early-onset severe retinal dystrophy (EOSRD) are both genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous, and characterised clinically by severe congenital/early infancy visual loss, nystagmus, amaurotic pupils and markedly reduced/absent full-field electroretinograms. The vast genetic heterogeneity of inherited retinal disease has been established over the last 10 - 20 years, with disease-causing variants identified in 25 genes to date associated with LCA/EOSRD, accounting for 70-80% of cases, with thereby more genes yet to be identified. There is now far greater understanding of the structural and functional associations seen in the various LCA/EOSRD genotypes. Subsequent development/characterisation of LCA/EOSRD animal models has shed light on the underlying pathogenesis and allowed the demonstration of successful rescue with gene replacement therapy and pharmacological intervention in multiple models. These advancements have culminated in more than 12 completed, ongoing and anticipated phase I/II and phase III gene therapy and pharmacological human clinical trials. This review describes the clinical and genetic characteristics of LCA/EOSRD and the differential diagnoses to be considered. We discuss in further detail the diagnostic clinical features, pathophysiology, animal models and human treatment studies and trials, in the more common genetic subtypes and/or those closest to intervention.

Indexed as

Eye Diseases, HereditaryLeber Congenital AmaurosisRetinal DystrophiesAnimalsDrug TherapyEye ProteinsGenetic TherapyGenotypeHumansMolecular BiologyMutationEye Proteinsearly onset severe retinal dystrophyeosrdgene therapylcaleber congenital amaurosis(MeSH terms): retinal diseasesretinal cone photoreceptor cellsreviewrtinal rod photoreceptor cellssecordsevere early childhood onset retinal dystrophy

Identifiers

PMID28689169
PMCPMC5574398
OpenAlexW2729411160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.