Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28689043›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2017

Pooled Systemic Efficacy and Safety Data from the Pivotal Phase II Studies (NP28673 and NP28761) of Alectinib in ALK-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

James Chih-Hsin Yang, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, Luigi De Petris, Shirish Gadgeel, Leena Gandhi, Dong-Wan Kim, Fabrice Barlesi, Ramaswamy Govindan, Anne-Marie C Dingemans, Lucio Crino and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05015010 (Phase II, Open-label, Single-arm, Multicenter Study to Assess the Activity and Safety of ALectinib as NEO-adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-positive), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05015010 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Phase II, Open-label, Single-arm, Multicenter Study to Assess the Activity and Safety of ALectinib as NEO-adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-positive (ALK+) Locally Advanced Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): ALNEO Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGruppo Oncologico Italiano di Ricerca ClinicaRan2021 to 2026Enrolled33ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung CancerArmsAlectinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

James Chih-Hsin YangDepartment of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Centre, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: chihyang@ntu.edu.tw.
Sai-Hong Ignatius OuChao Family Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California.
Luigi De PetrisOncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Shirish GadgeelKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Leena GandhiNew York University, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Dong-Wan KimSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Fabrice BarlesiAix Marseille University; Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Ramaswamy GovindanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Anne-Marie C DingemansMaastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lucio CrinoIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la cura dei Tumori, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Meloda, Italy.
Herve LenaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, Rennes University, Rennes, France.
Sanjay PopatRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Jin Seok AhnSamsung Medical Centre, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eric DansinCentre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France.
Sophie GoldingF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Walter BordognaF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Bogdana BalasF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Peter N MorcosF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Innovation Center, New York, New York.
Ali ZeaiterF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Alice T ShawMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL M STEMMER · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlectinib demonstrated clinical efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in two phase II studies (NP28761 and NP28673). Here we report the pooled efficacy and safety data after 15 and 18 months more follow-up than in the respective primary analyses.

methodsEnrolled patients had ALK receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK)-positive NSCLC and had progressed while taking, or could not tolerate, crizotinib. Patients received oral alectinib, 600 mg twice daily. The primary end point in both studies was objective response rate assessed by an independent review committee (IRC) using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary end points included disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

resultsThe pooled data set included 225 patients (n = 138 in NP28673 and n = 87 in NP28761). The response-evaluable population included 189 patients (84% [n = 122 in NP28673 and n = 67 in NP28761]). In the response-evaluable population, objective response rate as assessed by the IRC was 51.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44.0-58.6 [all PRs]), the disease control rate was 78.8% (95% CI: 72.3-84.4), and the median duration of response was 14.9 months (95% CI: 11.1-20.4) after 58% of events. Median progression-free survival as assessed by the IRC was 8.3 months (95% CI: 7.0-11.3) and median overall survival was 26.0 months (95% CI: 21.4-not estimable). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) occurred in 40% of patients, 6% of patients had treatment withdrawn on account of AEs, and 33% had AEs leading to dose interruptions/modification.

conclusionsThis pooled data analysis confirmed the robust systemic efficacy of alectinib in ALK-positive NSCLC with a durable response rate. Alectinib also had an acceptable safety profile with a longer duration of follow-up.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarbazolesCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesTreatment OutcomealectinibCarbazolesPiperidinesAlectinibNon–small cell lung cancerNP28673NP28761Pooled analysis

Identifiers

PMID28689043
PMCPMC6886236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.