Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28688938›Full record

ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2018

Comparative study of endoscopic surveillance in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer according to CDH1 mutation status.

Emma Z Mi, Ella Z Mi, Massimiliano di Pietro, Maria O'Donovan, Richard H Hardwick, Susan Richardson, Hisham Ziauddeen, Paul C Fletcher, Carlos Caldas, Marc Tischkowitz and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03950908 (Single-bite Versus Double-bite Technique for Mapping Biopsies During Endoscopic Surveillance of Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03950908 nacompletednot on this map

Single-bite Versus Double-bite Technique for Mapping Biopsies During Endoscopic Surveillance of Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer: a Single Center, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CambridgeRan2017 to 2018Enrolled48ConditionsHereditary Diffuse Gastric CancerArmsSingle bite biopsy technique, Double bite biopsy technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predictors of early cancer burden inEClinicalMedicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Optical coherence tomography and elastography forJournal of biomedical optics · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Emma Z MiSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ella Z MiSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Massimiliano di PietroMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Maria O'DonovanDepartment of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Richard H HardwickDepartment of Oesophago-Gastric Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Susan RichardsonFamilial Gastric Cancer Study, Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Hisham ZiauddeenCambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Paul C FletcherDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Carlos CaldasCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Marc TischkowitzDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Krish RagunathNIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Rebecca C FitzgeraldMRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust · GBHutchison/MRC Research Centre · GBMRC Cancer Unit · GBNIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsHereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) accounts for 1% of gastric cancer cases. For patients with a germline CDH1 mutation, risk-reducing gastrectomy is recommended. However, for those delaying surgery or for families with no causative mutation identified, regular endoscopy is advised. This study aimed to determine the yield of signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) foci in individuals with a CDH1 pathogenic variant compared with those without and how this varies with successive endoscopies.

methodsPatients fulfilling HDGC criteria were recruited to a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Endoscopy was performed according to a strict protocol with visual inspection followed by focal lesion and random biopsy sampling to detect foci of SRCC. Survival analysis determined progression to finding of SRCC according to CDH1 mutation status. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 and 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaires assessed quality of life before surveillance and each endoscopy.

resultsEighty-five individuals fulfilling HDGC criteria underwent 201 endoscopies; 54 (63.5%) tested positive for CDH1 mutation. SRCC yield was 61.1% in CDH1 mutation carriers compared with 9.7% in noncarriers, and mutation-positive patients had a 10-fold risk of SRCC on endoscopy compared with those with no mutation detected (P < .0005). Yield of SRCC decreased substantially with subsequent endoscopies. Surveillance was associated with improved psychological health.

conclusionsSRCC foci are prevalent in CDH1 mutation carriers and can be detected at endoscopy using a standardized, multiple biopsy sampling protocol. Decreasing yield over time suggests that the frequency of endoscopy might be reduced. For patients with no CDH1 pathogenic variant detected, the cost-to-benefit ratio needs to be assessed in view of the low yield.

Indexed as

AdultAntigens, CDBiopsyCadherinsCarcinoma, Signet Ring CellEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGastric MucosaGastroscopyGerm-Line MutationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceProspective StudiesAntigens, CDCadherinsCDH1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28688938
PMCPMC5780354
OpenAlexW2724907058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.