Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28688295›Full record

SynthesisDrug and alcohol dependence2017

Contingency Management interventions for non-prescribed drug use during treatment for opiate addiction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tom S Ainscough, Ann McNeill, John Strang, Robert Calder, Leonie S Brose

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Management of opioid use disorder: 2024 update to the national clinical practice guideline.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Contingency management for treatment attendance: A meta-analysis.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Opioid use disorder in primary care: PEER umbrella systematic review of systematic reviews.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Reinforcing exercise to improve drug abuse treatment outcomes: A randomized controlled study in a substance use disorder outpatient treatment setting.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tom S AinscoughAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, UK. Electronic address: thomas.ainscough@kcl.ac.uk.
Ann McNeillAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, UK.
John StrangAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Robert CalderAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Leonie S BroseAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, UK.
UK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19748Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsUse of non-prescribed drugs during treatment for opiate addiction reduces treatment success, creating a need for effective interventions. This review aimed to assess the efficacy of contingency management, a behavioural treatment that uses rewards to encourage desired behaviours, for treating non-prescribed drug use during opiate addiction treatment.

methodsA systematic search of the databases Embase, PsychInfo, PsychArticles and Medline from inception to March 2015 was performed. Random effects meta-analysis tested the use of contingency management to treat the use of drugs during opiate addiction treatment, using either longest duration of abstinence (LDA) or percentage of negative samples (PNS). Random effects moderator analyses were performed for six potential moderators: drug targeted for intervention, decade in which the study was carried out, study quality, intervention duration, type of reinforcer, and form of opiate treatment.

resultsThe search returned 3860 papers; 22 studies met inclusion criteria and were meta-analysed. Follow-up data was only available for three studies, so all analyses used end of treatment data. Contingency management performed significantly better than control in reducing drug use measured using LDA (d=0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.72) or PNS (d=0.41) (95% CI: 0.28-0.54). This was true for all drugs other than opiates. The only significant moderator was drug targeted (LDA: Q=10.75, p=0.03).

conclusionContingency management appears to be efficacious for treating most drug use during treatment for opiate addiction. Further research is required to ascertain the full effects of moderating variables, and longer term effects.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidBehavior TherapyHumansAnalgesics, OpioidCocaineContingency managementMeta-analysisOpiatesPolysubstanceReinforcementTobacco

Identifiers

PMID28688295
PMCPMC5558146
OpenAlexW2631955840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.