ArticleThe Laryngoscope2018
Revision rates and time to revision following endoscopic sinus surgery: A large database analysis.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05454072 (SinoNasal Microbiota Transfer), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
SinoNasal Microbiota Transfer (SNMT) to Treat Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- The clinical course of nasal polyps in relation with histological and radiological findings.Asia Pacific allergy · 2026Article
- Beyond type 2 inflammation: An innate-myeloid axis is linked to recurrence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Article
- Impact of Early Versus Delayed Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Draf III Procedure Using Multiple Pedicled Mucosal Flaps for Refractory Frontal Sinusitis: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Comparison of Long-Term Revision Rates and Health Care Utilization Between Standalone Balloon Sinus Dilation and Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients Without Nasal Polyps: Is the Balloon Value Proposition Overinflated?American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2026Article
- Coating Doyle Nasal Silicone Splints with a Sustained Release Varnish Containing Antibiotics Provides Long-Term Protection fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predictive Modeling of Surgically Recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis Using Integrated Feature Sets.Ear, nose, & throat journal · 2025Article
- Recurrence of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps After Surgery: Risk Factors, Predictive Models, and Treatment Approaches with a Focus on Western and Asian Differences.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- The Clinical Outcome of Image-Guided System in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Review
- A Longitudinal Study Investigating Whether Chronic Rhinosinusitis Influences the Subsequent Risk of Developing Dementia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Chitogel improves long-term health economic outcomes following endoscopic sinus surgery in severe chronic rhinosinusitis patients.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Predictors and Time Interval of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Recurrence After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2023Article
- Endoscopic sinus surgery outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and immunoglobulin deficiencies.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Steroid-Impregnated Spacers After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2023Article
- Neutrophils Play an Important Role in the Recurrence of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Assessing Feasibility and Safety of Using Ultrasonic Bone Aspirator for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society · 2022Article
- Creation of a Novel Preoperative Imaging Review Acronym to Aid in Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Review
- Host and Surgical Factors Affecting the Frequency and Duration of Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.Cureus · 2022Article
- A modest proposal for a new way forward for clinical research: Involve insurance companies.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectives/hypothesisEndoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is performed for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) that have failed maximal medical therapy. This study seeks to determine the prevalence of revision surgery and factors predicting the need for revision after ESS using a large statewide surgery database. STUDY
designLarge retrospective cohort study using the State Ambulatory Surgery Database for the state of California between 2005 and 2011.
methodsWe identified over 61,000 patients with CRS who underwent ESS, determined by Current Procedural Terminology code. We identified which patients underwent a repeat surgery, and performed multivariable modeling to determine which factors (nasal polyps, age, gender, insurance, hospital setting, ethnicity) predicted the need for revision. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals are presented.
resultsOf 61,339 patients who underwent ESS, 4,078 (6.65%) returned for revision ESS during the time period investigated. In a multivariable logistic regression model, positive predictors of revision were a diagnosis of nasal polyps (AOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.11-1.29, P < .001) and female gender (AOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.11-1.29, P < .001); public insurance was marginally predictive of increased reoperation (AOR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00-1.21, P = .048). Patients of Hispanic ethnicity were less likely to have revision surgery (AOR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.97, P = .011). Age, income, and hospital setting were not significant predictors.
conclusionsA minority of patients with CRS who undergo ESS will have a revision surgery. This likelihood is increased in female patients and those with nasal polyps, and decreased in patients of Hispanic ethnicity, even when controlling for income, insurance, and hospital setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:31-36, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.