ArticlePlant cell reports2017
Chemical proteomic analysis of 6-benzylaminopurine molecular partners in wheat grains.
Article in Plant cell reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The origin and early evolution of cytokinin signaling.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- The Hulks and the Deadpools of the Cytokinin Universe: A Dual Strategy for Cytokinin Production, Translocation, and Signal Transduction.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Unique organization of photosystem II supercomplexes and megacomplexes in Norway spruce.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2020Article
- Jasmonate-independent regulation of digestive enzyme activity in the carnivorous butterwort Pinguicula × Tina.Journal of experimental botany · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
key messageAn affinity-based chemical proteomic technique enabled direct identification of BAP-interacting proteins in wheat, including the well-known cytokinin-binder, cytokinin-binding protein 1. In this work, we show the development of a chemical proteomic technique for the identification of proteins binding to natural aromatic cytokinins (CKs). 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and documented CK-binder, wheat germ-allocated cytokinin-binding protein 1 (CBP-1), were suggested as an ideal proof-of concept affinity pair. Therefore, wheat grains were chosen as a model plant material. The BAP affinity beads were prepared by the immobilization of synthesized BAP-derived ligand to a commercial, pre-activated resin and used to isolate target proteins. The proteomic analysis of complex plant extracts is often complicated by the presence of highly abundant background proteins; in this case, the omnipresent alpha-amylase inhibitors (AAIs). To cope with this problem, we included SDS-PAGE, in-gel trypsin digestion and fraction pooling prior to shotgun analysis, which brought about an obvious drop in the signals belonging to the obstructing proteins. This was accompanied by a sharp increase in the number of identified BAP targets in comparison to a conventional in-solution digestion approach. To distinguish specific CK-binding proteins from those having a general affinity for nucleotide-like compounds, competitive pull-downs with natural nucleotides and free BAP were included in every affinity experiment. By this approach, we were able to identify a group of BAP-interacting proteins, which were subsequently found to be related to biological processes affected by CKs. Moreover, the selected affinity enrichment strategy was verified by the detection of the aforementioned CK-interacting protein, CBP-1. We propose that the developed method represents a promising tool for appealing research of as yet unknown CK molecular partners in plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.