Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2017
Retrospective analysis of prognostic factors for Waldenstrӧm macroglobulinemia: a multicenter cooperative study in Japan.
Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic impact of pleural effusion in patients with malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and translational science · 2022Pooled it
- What is the most appropriate regimen for untreated Waldenström macroglobulinemia? - An updated analysis of rituximab and half-dose CHOP therapy and cost effectiveness.Blood research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although population-based cancer registries have reported lower incidence of Waldenstrӧm macroglobulinemia (WM) in East Asia than in Western countries, previous retrospective analyses have found the clinical features of WM to be similar in these two populations. To clarify the characteristics of Japanese WM patients, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory characteristics, treatments, outcomes, and prognostic factors in 93 patients with WM. Based on the Second International Workshop on WM (IWWM-2) criteria, symptomatic WM was found in 73 (78.5%) and asymptomatic WM in 20 (21.5%) of cases examined. The median overall survival (OS) was similar to that in reports from Western countries. Patients receiving treatment regimens including rituximab exhibited significantly better survival than those not given rituximab. Although prognostic factors for WM in Western countries may not apply to Japanese patients, our finding that newly diagnosed WM patients with pleural effusion have a poorer prognosis suggests that this may be a novel predictor of adverse prognosis in symptomatic WM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28687991What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.