Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28687845›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2017

Wayfinding and Glaucoma: A Virtual Reality Experiment.

Fábio B Daga, Eduardo Macagno, Cory Stevenson, Ahmed Elhosseiny, Alberto Diniz-Filho, Erwin R Boer, Jürgen Schulze, Felipe A Medeiros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deviated Saccadic Trajectory as a Biometric Signature of Glaucoma.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Simulation of Oscillopsia in Virtual Reality.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2018
    Article
  6. Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Ophthalmology: A Contemporary Prospective.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fábio B DagaVisual Performance Laboratory, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Eduardo MacagnoDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States 3Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Cory StevensonDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States 3Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Ahmed ElhosseinyVisual Performance Laboratory, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States 4California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology (Calit2), University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Alberto Diniz-FilhoVisual Performance Laboratory, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Erwin R BoerVisual Performance Laboratory, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Jürgen SchulzeCalifornia Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology (Calit2), University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States 5Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Felipe A MedeirosVisual Performance Laboratory, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.

Funding

Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS): Functional ImpairmentR01EY021818 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MEDEIROS, FELIPE · 2011 to 2015
$3.4M
Development of a Portable Objective Method for Assessment of Visual Field LossR21EY025056 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JUNG, TZYY-PING, MEDEIROS, FELIPE · 2015 to 2016
$422k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021818NEI NIH HHS R21 EY025056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Wayfinding, the process of determining and following a route between an origin and a destination, is an integral part of everyday tasks. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of glaucomatous visual field loss on wayfinding behavior using an immersive virtual reality (VR) environment. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 31 glaucomatous patients and 20 healthy subjects without evidence of overall cognitive impairment. Wayfinding experiments were modeled after the Morris water maze navigation task and conducted in an immersive VR environment. Two rooms were built varying only in the complexity of the visual scene in order to promote allocentric-based (room A, with multiple visual cues) versus egocentric-based (room B, with single visual cue) spatial representations of the environment. Wayfinding tasks in each room consisted of revisiting previously visible targets that subsequently became invisible. Results: For room A, glaucoma patients spent on average 35.0 seconds to perform the wayfinding task, whereas healthy subjects spent an average of 24.4 seconds (P = 0.001). For room B, no statistically significant difference was seen on average time to complete the task (26.2 seconds versus 23.4 seconds, respectively; P = 0.514). For room A, each 1-dB worse binocular mean sensitivity was associated with 3.4% (P = 0.001) increase in time to complete the task. Conclusions: Glaucoma patients performed significantly worse on allocentric-based wayfinding tasks conducted in a VR environment, suggesting visual field loss may affect the construction of spatial cognitive maps relevant to successful wayfinding. VR environments may represent a useful approach for assessing functional vision endpoints for clinical trials of emerging therapies in ophthalmology.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleGlaucomaHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPsychomotor PerformanceRegression AnalysisSpace PerceptionSpatial BehaviorUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID28687845
PMCPMC5499646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.