Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28687831›Full record

SynthesisJAMA ophthalmology2017

Risk of Intraocular Bleeding With Novel Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Michelle T Sun, Megan K Wood, WengOnn Chan, Dinesh Selva, Prashanthan Sanders, Robert J Casson, Christopher X Wong

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Occurrence of intraocular hemorrhages under monotherapy or combination therapy of antiplatelets and anticoagulants using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2023
    Article
  7. [Toxic retinopathies].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Article
  8. Perioperative Management of Anticoagulants in Ocular Surgeries.International ophthalmology clinics · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michelle T SunSouth Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide.
Megan K WoodSouth Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide.
WengOnn ChanSouth Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide.
Dinesh SelvaSouth Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide.
Prashanthan SandersCentre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide.
Robert J CassonSouth Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide.
Christopher X WongCentre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, The University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide.
Institute of Ophthalmology · MXRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: It is unclear if the risk of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants differs compared with warfarin. Objective: To characterize the risk of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin. Data Sources: A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken in an academic medical setting. MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials published up until August 2016. This search was supplemented by manual bibliography searches of identified trials and other review articles. Study Selection: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were phase 3 randomized clinical trials, enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism, compared a novel oral anticoagulant (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) with warfarin, and recorded event data on intraocular bleeding. Data on intraocular bleeding were pooled using inverse-variance, weighted, fixed-effects meta-analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting data and assessing quality. Independent extraction was performed by 2 investigators. Main Outcomes and Measures: Intraocular bleeding events and associated risk ratio for novel oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin. Results: Twelve trials investigating 102 627 patients were included. Randomization to novel oral anticoagulants was associated with a 22% relative reduction in intraocular bleeding compared with warfarin (risk ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.99). There was no significant heterogeneity observed (I2 = 4.8%, P = .40). Comparably lower risks of intraocular bleeding with novel oral anticoagulants were seen in subgroup analyses, with no significant difference according to the indication for anticoagulation (P for heterogeneity = .49) or the novel oral anticoagulant type (P for heterogeneity = .15). Summary estimates did not differ materially when random-effects meta-analytic techniques were used. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that novel oral anticoagulants reduce the risk of intraocular bleeding by approximately one-fifth compared with warfarin. Similar benefits were seen in both patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Our data have particular relevance for patients at higher risk of spontaneous retinal and subretinal bleeding. These findings may also have important implications in the perioperative period, in which the use of novel oral anticoagulants may be superior. Future studies are required to better characterize the optimal management of patients with both ophthalmic disease and cardiovascular comorbidities requiring anticoagulation.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationDabigatranEye HemorrhageHumansPyrazolesPyridinesPyridonesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentRivaroxabanThiazolesVenous ThromboembolismWarfarinAnticoagulantsapixabanDabigatranedoxabanPyrazolesPyridinesPyridonesRivaroxabanThiazolesWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID28687831
PMCPMC5710315
OpenAlexW2728904067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.