ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2017
Radiosurgery for resected brain metastases-a new standard of care?
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of disparities in timely stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases in a safety net hospital system through a centralized workflow.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Tailored radiotherapy for brain metastases improves precision and outcomes.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial tumor beds on a ring-mounted Halcyon LINAC.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Investigation of the risk factors in the development of radionecrosis in patients with brain metastases undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Upfront Brain Treatments Followed by Lung Surgery Improves Survival for Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases: A Large Cohort Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- Outcome of Omani Women with Breast Cancer-associated Brain Metastases Experience from a University Hospital.Oman medical journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28687374What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.