Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28687338›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2017

Replicative DNA polymerase defects in human cancers: Consequences, mechanisms, and implications for therapy.

Stephanie R Barbari, Polina V Shcherbakova

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of PCNA Stability on the Formation of Mutations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. CSCO guidelines for colorectal cancer version 2024: Updates and discussions.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Optimizing Design of Genomics Studies for Clonal Evolution Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cancer driver mutations: predictions and reality.Trends in molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie R BarbariEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Polina V ShcherbakovaEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA. Electronic address: pshcherb@unmc.edu.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIS &CANCER BIOLOGYT32CA009476 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jennifer D. Black · 1988 to 2026
$6.2M
Translesion Synthesis DNA Polymerases and Genome InstabilityR01ES015869 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHCHERBAKOVA, POLINA V · 2009 to 2023
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009476NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fidelity of DNA replication relies on three error avoidance mechanisms acting in series: nucleotide selectivity of replicative DNA polymerases, exonucleolytic proofreading, and post-replicative DNA mismatch repair (MMR). MMR defects are well known to be associated with increased cancer incidence. Due to advances in DNA sequencing technologies, the past several years have witnessed a long-predicted discovery of replicative DNA polymerase defects in sporadic and hereditary human cancers. The polymerase mutations preferentially affect conserved amino acid residues in the exonuclease domain and occur in tumors with an extremely high mutation load. Thus, a concept has formed that defective proofreading of replication errors triggers the development of these tumors. Recent studies of the most common DNA polymerase variants, however, suggested that their pathogenicity may be determined by functional alterations other than loss of proofreading. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of the consequences of DNA polymerase mutations in cancers and the mechanisms of their mutator effects. We also discuss likely explanations for a high recurrence of some but not other polymerase variants and new ideas for therapeutic interventions emerging from the mechanistic studies.

Indexed as

MutationDNA Mismatch RepairDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase IIIDNA ReplicationFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsDNA Polymerase IIDNA Polymerase IIICancerDNA polymerase δDNA polymerase εMutatorProofreading

Identifiers

PMID28687338
PMCPMC5750057
OpenAlexW2623982605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.