Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28687080›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2017

Inhibition of RNA polymerase II allows controlled mobilisation of retrotransposons for plant breeding.

Michael Thieme, Sophie Lanciano, Sandrine Balzergue, Nicolas Daccord, Marie Mirouze, Etienne Bucher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. mScience advances · 2023
    Article
  19. Composition and Structure ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael ThiemeBotanical Institute, Zürich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 1, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Sophie LancianoInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR232 DIADE Diversité Adaptation et Développement des Plantes, Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France.
Sandrine BalzergueIRHS, Université d'Angers, INRA, AGROCAMPUS-Ouest, SFR4207 QUASAV, Université Bretagne Loire, 49045, Angers, France.
Nicolas DaccordIRHS, Université d'Angers, INRA, AGROCAMPUS-Ouest, SFR4207 QUASAV, Université Bretagne Loire, 49045, Angers, France.
Marie MirouzeInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR232 DIADE Diversité Adaptation et Développement des Plantes, Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France.
Etienne BucherIRHS, Université d'Angers, INRA, AGROCAMPUS-Ouest, SFR4207 QUASAV, Université Bretagne Loire, 49045, Angers, France. etienne.bucher@inra.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-3114-3763
Université Bretagne Loire · FRUniversité de Perpignan · FRUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetrotransposons play a central role in plant evolution and could be a powerful endogenous source of genetic and epigenetic variability for crop breeding. To ensure genome integrity several silencing mechanisms have evolved to repress retrotransposon mobility. Even though retrotransposons fully depend on transcriptional activity of the host RNA polymerase II (Pol II) for their mobility, it was so far unclear whether Pol II is directly involved in repressing their activity.

resultsHere we show that plants defective in Pol II activity lose DNA methylation at repeat sequences and produce more extrachromosomal retrotransposon DNA upon stress in Arabidopsis and rice. We demonstrate that combined inhibition of both DNA methylation and Pol II activity leads to a strong stress-dependent mobilization of the heat responsive ONSEN retrotransposon in Arabidopsis seedlings. The progenies of these treated plants contain up to 75 new ONSEN insertions in their genome which are stably inherited over three generations of selfing. Repeated application of heat stress in progeny plants containing increased numbers of ONSEN copies does not result in increased activation of this transposon compared to control lines. Progenies with additional ONSEN copies show a broad panel of environment-dependent phenotypic diversity.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that Pol II acts at the root of transposon silencing. This is important because it suggests that Pol II can regulate the speed of plant evolution by fine-tuning the amplitude of transposon mobility. Our findings show that it is now possible to study induced transposon bursts in plants and unlock their use to induce epigenetic and genetic diversity for crop breeding.

Indexed as

Plant BreedingRetroelementsArabidopsisDNA MethylationDNA, PlantGene Expression Regulation, PlantOryzaRNA Polymerase IIDNA, PlantRetroelementsRNA Polymerase IIArabidopsis thalianaDNA methylationEpigeneticsEvolutionGenome integrityOryza sativa

Identifiers

PMID28687080
PMCPMC5501947
OpenAlexW2730004793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.