Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28686691›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Use of fecal volatile organic compound analysis to discriminate between non-vaccinated and BCG-Vaccinated cattle prior to and after Mycobacterium bovis challenge.

Christine K Ellis, Somchai Rice, Devin Maurer, Randal Stahl, W Ray Waters, Mitchell V Palmer, Pauline Nol, Jack C Rhyan, Kurt C VerCauteren, Jacek A Koziel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Detection ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Non-Invasive Method to Detect Infection withSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Volatile Cues Influence Host-Choice in Arthropod Pests.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christine K EllisUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7367-0716
Somchai RiceDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Devin MaurerDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Randal StahlUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
W Ray WatersUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Mitchell V PalmerUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Pauline NolUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Wildlife Livestock Disease Investigations Team, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Jack C RhyanUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Wildlife Livestock Disease Investigations Team, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Kurt C VerCauterenUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Jacek A KozielDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USIowa State University · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis is a zoonotic disease of global public health concern. Development of diagnostic tools to improve test accuracy and efficiency in domestic livestock and enable surveillance of wildlife reservoirs would improve disease management and eradication efforts. Use of volatile organic compound analysis in breath and fecal samples is being developed and optimized as a means to detect disease in humans and animals. In this study we demonstrate that VOCs present in fecal samples can be used to discriminate between non-vaccinated and BCG-vaccinated cattle prior to and after Mycobacterium bovis challenge.

Indexed as

BCG VaccineAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildCattleFecesHumansMycobacterium bovisTuberculosis, BovineVolatile Organic CompoundsBCG VaccineVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID28686691
PMCPMC5501492
OpenAlexW2624882374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.