Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28686690›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Shifts in the bacterial community composition along deep soil profiles in monospecific and mixed stands of Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mangium.

Arthur Prudêncio de Araujo Pereira, Pedro Avelino Maia de Andrade, Daniel Bini, Ademir Durrer, Agnès Robin, Jean Pierre Bouillet, Fernando Dini Andreote, Elke Jurandy Bran Nogueira Cardoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mixed plantations ofEcology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arthur Prudêncio de Araujo PereiraDepartament of Soil Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, ESALQ/USP, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9402-3243
Pedro Avelino Maia de AndradeDepartament of Soil Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, ESALQ/USP, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel BiniUniversity Centro-Oeste, UNICENTRO, Guarapuava, Paraná, Brazil.
Ademir DurrerDepartament of Soil Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, ESALQ/USP, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Agnès RobinAgricultural Research for Development, CIRAD, Montpellier, France.
Jean Pierre BouilletAgricultural Research for Development, CIRAD, Montpellier, France.
Fernando Dini AndreoteDepartament of Soil Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, ESALQ/USP, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Elke Jurandy Bran Nogueira CardosoDepartament of Soil Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, ESALQ/USP, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our knowledge of the rhizosphere bacterial communities in deep soils and the role of Eucalyptus and Acacia on the structure of these communities remains very limited. In this study, we targeted the bacterial community along a depth profile (0 to 800 cm) and compared community structure in monospecific or mixed plantations of Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus grandis. We applied quantitative PCR (qPCR) and sequence the V6 region of the 16S rRNA gene to characterize composition of bacterial communities. We identified a decrease in bacterial abundance with soil depth, and differences in community patterns between monospecific and mixed cultivations. Sequence analysis indicated a prevalent effect of soil depth on bacterial communities in the mixed plant cultivation system, and a remarkable differentiation of bacterial communities in areas solely cultivated with Eucalyptus. The groups most influenced by soil depth were Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria (more frequent in samples between 0 and 300 cm). The predominant bacterial groups differentially displayed in the monospecific stands of Eucalyptus were Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. Our results suggest that the addition of an N2-fixing tree in a monospecific cultivation system modulates bacterial community composition even at a great depth. We conclude that co-cultivation systems may represent a key strategy to improve soil resources and to establish more sustainable cultivation of Eucalyptus in Brazil.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyAcaciaAcidobacteriaBacillotaBrazilConservation of Natural ResourcesDNA, BacterialEucalyptusMicrobial ConsortiaProteobacteriaRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilTreesDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil

Identifiers

PMID28686690
PMCPMC5501519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.